Inverse of Matrix - Product Form

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the 'Product Form' method for finding the inverse of a matrix, particularly in the context of the simplex method in Operations Research. This method involves using elementary row operations, which can be expressed as a product of elementary matrices. While it is noted that the method may primarily apply to basis matrices in simplex tables, its effectiveness for other types of matrices remains uncertain. A reference to this method is found in Hamdy Taha's "Operations Research," although the accompanying CD with detailed descriptions is missing for some users. Further insights or resources on the Product Form method are sought by participants in the discussion.
phiby
Messages
74
Reaction score
0
In a few books on Operations Research, I have found a reference to a method of finding the inverse of matrix using a method called as 'Product Form'. From the context, it looks like the product form method is used for finding the inverse of the basis matrix in a simplex table.
The method may or may not work for other kind of matrices. However, I couldn't find a good description of this method. One text which mentions this is "Operations Research" by Hamdy Taha. A description of the method is supposedly given in the CD accompanying the book - but I have a hand me down book & don't have the CD. If anyone here knows more about this method or has a pointer to it, please let me know.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You can find the jargon "product form" used in articles if you search using the keywords:
inverse matrix simplex basis product form

As far as I can see, it simply refers to the fact that if you do elementary row operations on a matrix, the combined effect of these can be represented as a product of elementary matrices. Hence if you do Gaussian elimination on a matrix, you can keep track of the operations you do and this gives you a representation of the inverse of the matrix as a product of elementary matrices.
 
I am studying the mathematical formalism behind non-commutative geometry approach to quantum gravity. I was reading about Hopf algebras and their Drinfeld twist with a specific example of the Moyal-Weyl twist defined as F=exp(-iλ/2θ^(μν)∂_μ⊗∂_ν) where λ is a constant parametar and θ antisymmetric constant tensor. {∂_μ} is the basis of the tangent vector space over the underlying spacetime Now, from my understanding the enveloping algebra which appears in the definition of the Hopf algebra...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K