Inverse Square Law Homework: Help with #2 Needed

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the challenges faced in solving a homework problem related to the Inverse Square Law. The participant expresses frustration over the vagueness of the question, indicating that it requires understanding how force diminishes with increasing radius. Specifically, they note that at double the radius, the force spreads over a 2x2 area, and at triple the radius, it spreads over a 3x3 area, leading to a decrease proportional to the area. For part b, the participant suggests providing a personal opinion supported by reasoning.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Inverse Square Law
  • Basic knowledge of force and area relationships
  • Familiarity with mathematical reasoning and problem-solving
  • Ability to articulate and support personal opinions in scientific contexts
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the mathematical principles behind the Inverse Square Law
  • Explore examples of force distribution over varying areas
  • Study effective methods for articulating scientific opinions
  • Practice solving similar physics problems to enhance problem-solving skills
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, educators looking for teaching strategies, and anyone seeking to improve their problem-solving skills in scientific contexts.

halvizo1031
Messages
77
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Can someone help me out with number two please? I'm not sure what exactly it's asking me to do.


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution

 

Attachments

  • scan0001.jpg
    scan0001.jpg
    34.3 KB · Views: 430
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't really think you can DO much of anything. Except try to match the vagueness of the question with an equally vague answer. They expect you to say that at double the radius the "force" "spreads out" from a 1x1 square to a 2x2 square, so it decreases proportional to the area. And at triple the radius it's spread over a 3x3 square. It's really an awful question. For part b) just give an opinion. Try back it up by giving your reason for the opinion. That's all I can say.
 

Similar threads

Undergrad Electricity and Magnetism: Verifying the Inverse Square Law
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Find the slope of the tangent line to the function's inverse
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
Purpose of the derivative of the inverse function
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
Inverse of a multivariate function
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
Undergrad Sound pressure and inverse distance law
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Equation involving inverse trigonometric function
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
Linear Algebra: Question about Inverse of Diagonal Matrices
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Undergrad Physical approximation to inverse square law using magnet(s)
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
1K
Undergrad Field Strength of Permanent Magnets -- Inverse square or inverse cube?
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
How to Determine Correct Inverse Trig Angle?
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K