Invertibility of the product of matrices

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mr Davis 97
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Matrices Product
Click For Summary
If A is an invertible n by n matrix and B is not invertible, then the product AB is also not invertible. The reasoning hinges on the fact that for a product of matrices to be invertible, both matrices must be invertible. Attempts to show that AB has an inverse lead to contradictions, particularly when considering the properties of determinants. The discussion emphasizes that assuming AB is invertible would imply B must also be invertible, which contradicts the initial condition. Thus, the conclusion is that AB cannot be invertible if B is not.
Mr Davis 97
Messages
1,461
Reaction score
44

Homework Statement


Let A and B be n by n matrices such that A is invertible and B is not invertible.
Then, AB is not invertible.

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution



We know that A is invertible, so there exists a matrix C such that CA = I. Then we can right -multiply by B so that CAB = IB = I. Then by the associative property C(AB) = I. By the same argument, we can show that there is a C such that (AB)C = I. So AB has an inverse.

Obviously this is wrong, because in order for AB to have an inverse, both A and B must have an inverse. So what am I doing wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
CAB=IB but you can't conclude IB=I, IB=B
 
Maybe you should concentrate on the non invertible part. What does it mean to B, not being invertible? Is there a positive property, i.e. without the use of non, not or no?
 
Mr Davis 97 said:

Homework Statement


Let A and B be n by n matrices such that A is invertible and B is not invertible.
Then, AB is not invertible.

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution



We know that A is invertible, so there exists a matrix C such that CA = I. Then we can right -multiply by B so that CAB = IB = I. Then by the associative property C(AB) = I. By the same argument, we can show that there is a C such that (AB)C = I. So AB has an inverse.

Obviously this is wrong, because in order for AB to have an inverse, both A and B must have an inverse. So what am I doing wrong?

What tools/results are you allowed to use? Do you know about determinants? Do you know how determinants relate to the invertability/non-invertability of a matrix?
 
Assume that ##AB## is invertible. This means that there is a ##C## such that ##CAB = I## and ##ABC = I##. Can you prove now that ##B## is invertible? (and thus deriving a contradiction).
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
5K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K