Ionizing Radiation Interaction with Matter

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the confusion regarding the derivation of the paths for incoming and outgoing photons in the context of ionizing radiation interaction with matter. The paths are defined as x=L/2 for incoming photons and x=r for outgoing photons, which raises questions about the assumptions made in the calculations. It is suggested that Tin represents the transmission factor before scattering, while Tout represents it after scattering, leading to uncertainty about the average photon path in the cylinder. The assumption that incoming photons do not converge towards the center while outgoing photons do is also questioned. Overall, clarity is sought on the rationale behind these specific path choices in the solution.
Graham87
Messages
72
Reaction score
16
Homework Statement
Problem c)
Relevant Equations
Beer Lambert Law
##\phi(x) = \phi(0) e^{-\mu x}##
##T=e^{-\mu x}##
Screenshot 2024-10-30 104110.png


Basically, I don't understand how they got x=L/2 and x=r paths of T_in and T_out. Below is elaboration.

I don't understand the choice of paths for incoming and outgoing photons in the solution for c).
The solution put incoming path to x=L―/2, while outgoing x=r.
As I interpret it, Tin is the transmission factor before scattering, while Tout is the transmission factor after scattering?
The average photon path traveled in the cylinder is L― and we should divide by 2 for the average path L―/2 before scattering?
Why put the outgoing photons as r? So we assume the photons scatter in the center? But then again we assumed the incoming path is L―/2, which is an average that does not considers all traveling to the center.

So the incoming photons are not assumed to have a mutual path towards the center, while all the outgoing photons should be assumed to travel from the center?

Basically, I don't understand how they got x=L/2 and x=r paths of T_in and T_out.


Screenshot 2024-10-30 104059.png
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
24
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Back
Top