Irodov 1.23 confusion: Calculate distance traveled and time elapsed for this decelerating particle

  • Thread starter Thread starter anthraxiom
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on solving a physics problem involving a decelerating particle, specifically calculating the distance traveled and time elapsed until the particle stops. The user initially derived the time using the equation T=(2√v0)/a but encountered confusion while calculating distance, leading to an incorrect result of s=0. The mistake was identified as the omission of the lower integration limit during the integration process to find distance, which is crucial for accurate results.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of kinematics and motion equations
  • Familiarity with calculus, specifically integration techniques
  • Knowledge of deceleration and its relationship with velocity
  • Ability to manipulate and rearrange algebraic equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Review integration techniques in calculus, focusing on definite integrals
  • Study kinematic equations for uniformly accelerated motion
  • Explore the relationship between velocity, acceleration, and distance
  • Practice solving similar physics problems involving deceleration and integration
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, particularly those focusing on kinematics and calculus applications, as well as educators looking for examples of common mistakes in problem-solving.

anthraxiom
Messages
19
Reaction score
3
Homework Statement
A point moves rectilinearly with deceleration whose modulus depends on the velocity v of the particle as shown in book, where a is a positive constant. At the initial moment the velocity of the point is equal to v0. What distance will it traverse before it stops? What time will it take to cover that distance?
Relevant Equations
acceleration=dv/dt=vdv/ds
v=ds/dt
I solved the for time but for distance am quite confused on why the approach im trying doesn't work.

First, let acceleration=w
w=-a√v
w=dv/dt=-a√v
rearranging, √v dv=-a dt

integrating both sides,
v0V∫√v dv=0T∫-a dt
where V is some arbitrary velocity at time T.
we get, (2√V)-(2√v0)=-aT------eqn 1

now we want to find time when V=0
putting V=0,
aT=2√v0
T=(2√v0)/a

now, to find distance, i took equation 1 and rearranged.
2(ds/dt)1/2=-aT+2√v0
squaring both sides,
ds/dt=(2√v0-aT)2/4

integrating,
s=(1/4)∫(2√v0-aT)2 dt where s is distance travelled
let (2√v0-aT)2=u
du/dt=-a
dt=du/-a
putting, (1/4)∫(2√v0-aT)2dt=-(1/4a)∫u2 du
this gives, s=-1/12((2√v0-aT)2)3

putting t=(2√v0)/a, we get s=0 which simply isnt possible and is the wrong answer. Can anyone tell me the mistake in my approach?

p.s. i know how to solve it using w=vdv/dt so please don't give me that solution.
Thanks
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
anthraxiom said:
Homework Statement: A point moves rectilinearly with deceleration whose modulus depends on the velocity v of the particle as shown in book, where a is a positive constant. At the initial moment the velocity of the point is equal to v0. What distance will it traverse before it stops? What time will it take to cover that distance?
Relevant Equations: acceleration=dv/dt=vdv/ds
v=ds/dt

I solved the for time but for distance am quite confused on why the approach im trying doesn't work.
First, let acceleration=w
w=-a√v
w=dv/dt=-a√v
rearranging, √v dv=-a dt
integrating both sides,
v0V∫√v dv=0T∫-a dt
where V is some arbitrary velocity at time T.
we get, (2√V)-(2√v0)=-aT------eqn 1
now we want to find time when V=0
putting V=0,
aT=2√v0
T=(2√v0)/a
now, to find distance, i took equation 1 and rearranged.
2(ds/dt)1/2=-aT+2√v0
squaring both sides,
ds/dt=(2√v0-aT)2/4
integrating,
s=(1/4)∫(2√v0-aT)2 dt where s is distance travelled
let (2√v0-aT)2=u
du/dt=-a
dt=du/-a
putting, (1/4)∫(2√v0-aT)2dt=-(1/4a)∫u2 du
this gives, s=-1/12((2√v0-aT)2)3
putting t=(2√v0)/a, we get s=0 which simply isnt possible and is the wrong answer. Can anyone tell me the mistake in my approach?
p.s. i know how to solve it using w=vdv/dt so please don't give me that solution.
Thanks
In integrating to get s, you forgot to apply the lower integration limit at t=0.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: anthraxiom
Chestermiller said:
In integrating to get s, you forgot to apply the lower integration limit at t=0.
Oh thank you so much I've been banging my head about this for 3 hours.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K