Medical Iron and Vitamin C: Enhancing Absorption

  • Thread starter Thread starter Far Star
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Iron
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the potential for topical vitamin C to enhance the dermal absorption of iron oxide, drawing a distinction between its effects in the gut versus the skin. Participants express skepticism about the efficacy of vitamin C in facilitating iron absorption through the skin, noting that dermal absorption relies on the ability of molecules or nanoparticles to penetrate membranes. Concerns are raised about the necessity of increasing iron intake, as most individuals likely consume sufficient iron unless they have specific malabsorption issues. The conversation also touches on the use of fine mineral particulates in cosmetics, particularly iron oxide, and the growing trend of incorporating vitamins like C and E into skin preparations. Some participants advocate for simpler formulations without nanoparticles until more research is available, while others mention the historical use of mineral makeup for various purposes, including sun protection.
Far Star
Messages
72
Reaction score
0
I might be posting this in the wrong area. If so, sorry about that. :<)

From what little I understand of the subject oral vitamin C helps the body absorb iron. Should this be the case, could topical vitamin C in combination with penetration enhancers also enhance dermal absorption of iron oxide?
 
Biology news on Phys.org
Here is an abstract of a paper about iron absorption and ascorbic acid (Vit C) in the human gut - field trials.
http://www.ajcn.org/cgi/content/abstract/67/5/873

My view on your question is no. Dermal absorption depends on the moleule or a nanoparticle in question being able to pass through membranes. Vitamin C in the gut has a very different effect on absorption of minerals in the gut than it would have dermally.
I don't know of any research on the subject, so this is a guess.

From:
http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/hac/pha/georgetown/gsc_p1.html
The only standards available to use for comparison are those that have been developed for use in occupational settings. Occupational settings typically involve much higher exposures and exposure to many materials. The American Conference of Government Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH) recommend an exposure limit of 5,000 µg/m3 time weighted average measured as iron. The United States Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) limits permissible exposure to 10,000 µg/m3 measured as total iron particulates.

Particulate matter is a complex ...

Why are you interested? If you are considering increasing the iron available to your body as a nutrient - don't. Unless you have malabsorptive disorders, you are probably already getting more iron in your diet than you need. If you are working around iron particulates, don't use vitamin C skin cream if you think it has an effect.
 
Last edited:
jim mcnamara said:
Why are you interested? If you are considering increasing the iron available to your body as a nutrient - don't. Unless you have malabsorptive disorders, you are probably already getting more iron in your diet than you need. If you are working around iron particulates, don't use vitamin C skin cream if you think it has an effect.

Thanks, Jim.

I was more concerned with dermal absorption. A number of cosmetics and skin preparations contain nano-particles of coated or uncoated iron oxide with various penetration enhancers and vitamins, C being a typical additive. Due to the reduced particle size the question came to mind.
 
Bare Minerals makeup

People have been putting fine mineral particulates on their skin for a lot of reasons for a very long time. There is even archeological data to believe other human species may have used used ochre on the skin.

The addition of other goodies, ascorbic acid and tocopherols, is new to the skin preparation market. I'd vote for something like Bare Minerals if I needed makeup. But since they do not let me out, it doesn't matter.
 
jim mcnamara said:
Bare Minerals makeup

People have been putting fine mineral particulates on their skin for a lot of reasons for a very long time. There is even archeological data to believe other human species may have used used ochre on the skin.

The addition of other goodies, ascorbic acid and tocopherols, is new to the skin preparation market. I'd vote for something like Bare Minerals if I needed makeup. But since they do not let me out, it doesn't matter.

I'm sure you'd look smashing in the misty mauve eyeshadow I saw earlier. *<) Seriously, quite a few men have been using mineral makeup as a light sunscreen and to add a little color in winter.

A few mineral makeup companies choose not to use nano-particles so there are choices out there. Until more studies are done I think I'd rather err on the side of something simple and effective without the bells and whistles.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
7K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
11K
Replies
2
Views
3K