1. Limited time only! Sign up for a free 30min personal tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Irradiance measurement procedure

  1. Nov 13, 2013 #1
    Here's what I'm thinking. The sun is too bright to measure directly with our equipment. If I calibrate without a filter, and capture the reference spectrum with and without the filter, then I can model how the filter changes the spectrum. This way I can capture the sun spectrum with the filter, and transform the data as if I had not used it.

    What I mean to say is, if
    then is it valid to argue that

    Or is it that [itex]G(\lambda)[/itex] is dependent on I?

    [itex]I_{r}[/itex] is the irradiance of the reference
    [itex]I_{r+f}[/itex] is the irradiance of the reference measured through a filter
    [itex]I_{s}[/itex] is the irradiance of the sample
    [itex]I_{s+f}[/itex] is the irradiance of the sample measured through the same filter
  2. jcsd
  3. Nov 14, 2013 #2

    Andy Resnick

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Education Advisor

    As a first approximation, that approach is fine. The main shortcomings with this approach are 1) if G(λ) << 1 (the filter transmits very little light at some wavelengths) and/or 2) if your detector is a coarse-grained spectrometer (say a color camera). Problem (1) introduces error by amplifying noise, and problem (2) means that the measured spectrum is a convolution, not a multiplication, so the 'division' step is actually a deconvolution.

    The filter transmittance should not vary with intensity unless it has been specifically designed to do so (e.g. a saturable absorber).
Share this great discussion with others via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook