- #1
su-ki
- 2
- 0
In Mark Srednicki's book "Quantum Field Theory"
He says that a tensor field [itex] B^{αβ} [/itex] with no particular symmetry can be written as :-
[itex] B^{αβ} = A^{αβ} + S^{αβ} + (1/4) g^{αβ} T(x) [/itex] Equn. 33.6
where A - Antisymmetric, S = symmetric and T(x) = trace of [itex] B^{αβ} [/itex] .
Is there any reason for explicit addition of trace term ?
Coz generally we split things into symmetric and antisymmetric parts and trace is included in symmetric part.
He says that a tensor field [itex] B^{αβ} [/itex] with no particular symmetry can be written as :-
[itex] B^{αβ} = A^{αβ} + S^{αβ} + (1/4) g^{αβ} T(x) [/itex] Equn. 33.6
where A - Antisymmetric, S = symmetric and T(x) = trace of [itex] B^{αβ} [/itex] .
Is there any reason for explicit addition of trace term ?
Coz generally we split things into symmetric and antisymmetric parts and trace is included in symmetric part.
Last edited: