Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Irreducible representation of tensor field

  1. Jan 17, 2013 #1
    In Mark Srednicki's book "Quantum Field Theory"
    He says that a tensor field [itex] B^{αβ} [/itex] with no particular symmetry can be written as :-

    [itex] B^{αβ} = A^{αβ} + S^{αβ} + (1/4) g^{αβ} T(x) [/itex] Equn. 33.6

    where A - Antisymmetric, S = symmetric and T(x) = trace of [itex] B^{αβ} [/itex] .

    Is there any reason for explicit addition of trace term ?
    Coz generally we split things into symmetric and antisymmetric parts and trace is included in symmetric part.
     
    Last edited: Jan 17, 2013
  2. jcsd
  3. Jan 17, 2013 #2

    Bill_K

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor

    If you're talking about the general linear group GL(n), the irreducible representations are the tensors whose indices have been symmetrized in a particular way. When you go to the orthogonal group, there are fewer transformations in the group, and some of these representations are no longer irreducible. The operation of contraction (forming a trace) commutes with the orthogonal transformations.
     
  4. Jan 17, 2013 #3

    samalkhaiat

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor


    This is true only if the symmetric part is traceless. In general, for any rank-2 tensor, we write
    [tex]B^{ ab } = B^{ (ab) } + B^{ [ab] } .[/tex]
    Then we take the symmetric part and decompose it as
    [tex]
    B^{ (ab) } = \left( B^{ (ab) } - \frac{ 1 }{ 4 } g^{ ab } B \right) + \frac{ 1 }{ 4 } g^{ ab } B .
    [/tex]
    The tensor (call it [itex]S^{ ab }[/itex]) in the bracket on the left-hand side is symmetric and traceless, because
    [tex]B = \mbox{ Tr } ( B^{ (ab) } ) = g_{ ab } B^{ (ab) }[/tex]
    So, our original tensor can now be written as
    [tex]
    B^{ ab } = A^{ ab } + S^{ ab } + \frac{ 1 }{ 4 } g^{ ab } B ,
    [/tex]
    where [itex]A^{ ab } = - A^{ ba } \equiv B^{ [ab] }[/itex]

    See posts #24 and 25 in

    www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=192572&page=2

    Sam
     
  5. Jan 17, 2013 #4
    yea, i got just it, thank u :)
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook