Is a Closed Graph of a Function on a Closed Interval Indicative of Continuity?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mystic998
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Topology
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the continuity of a function defined on a closed interval, specifically questioning whether a closed graph of a function implies continuity. The context involves real-valued functions and properties of compactness.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking, Exploratory

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the implications of a closed graph and compactness, questioning the relationship between limits and function values. Some raise concerns about the uniqueness of limit points and the compatibility with the function being single-valued.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants examining various aspects of the problem, including the implications of the Bolzano-Weierstrass theorem. There is a suggestion of exploring the converse scenario regarding continuity and closed graphs.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the need for counterexamples and the implications of compactness in the context of the problem. The discussion reflects uncertainty about the assumptions and definitions involved in the continuity of functions with closed graphs.

Mystic998
Messages
203
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


All right, so this appeared on my final. The intervals are in the reals:

If f : [a, b] -> [c, d] , and the graph of f is closed, is f continuous?


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


Well, my gut reaction is no, just because it seems like a fairly strong claim, but I couldn't really come up with a decent counterexample. On the other hand, I can see that the graph has to be compact. And I think that would imply that f([a, b]) has to be compact (if it wasn't you could just take any open cover of [a, b] and an open cover of f([a, b]) that doesn't have a finite subcover, then the Cartesian product would be an open cover without finite subcover, I think). But I'm not sure where I can go from there or if that's even useful information.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If the sequence x_i->x in [a,b] then the sequence f(x_i) has cluster points in [c,d] because [c,d] is compact. Suppose it has two unequal ones y1 and y2. Then since the graph is closed y1 and y2 are both on the graph. Is this compatible with f being a single valued function?
 
But what guarentees that the limit of f(x_i) is f(x)?
 
Bolzano-Weierstrass
 
quasar987 said:
But what guarentees that the limit of f(x_i) is f(x)?

If f(x_i) has a limit y, then (x,y) is on the graph since the graph is closed. The graph is the set of all points (x,f(x)).
 
That's true. That was a good little problem!
 
What about the converse: if f:[a,b]->[c,d] is continuous, then is its graph closed?
 
That one's easy. If (x_i, f(x_i)) is a converging sequence in the graph, then it means x_i -->x, for some x in [a,b], and by continuity, f(x_i)-->f(x). Since (x,f(x)) is in the graph, it's closed.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
17K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
558
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
32
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K