Is a Skydiver at Terminal Velocity an Inertial Reference Frame?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

A skydiver falling at terminal velocity serves as an inertial reference frame due to the absence of acceleration, resulting in a constant velocity and no net force acting on the skydiver. In the context of an elevator experiment, the correct answers regarding its inertial status are A (the elevator is an inertial frame of reference), D (the elevator may be moving at a constant velocity upward), and E (the elevator may be moving at a constant velocity downward). The key takeaway is that both the skydiver and the elevator can be considered inertial frames under specific conditions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of inertial reference frames
  • Basic principles of Newtonian physics
  • Concept of terminal velocity
  • Knowledge of forces and motion in vertical systems
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of inertial and non-inertial reference frames
  • Explore the concept of terminal velocity in different mediums
  • Learn about Newton's laws of motion and their applications
  • Investigate the effects of acceleration on objects in various reference frames
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, educators, and anyone interested in understanding the principles of motion and reference frames in classical mechanics.

Soaring Crane
Messages
461
Reaction score
0
1) Which object provides an inertial frame of reference?

a. the tip of the moving second hand of a clock
b. a rock thrown vertically upward
c. a pendulum swinging with no air resistance
d. a skydiver falling at terminal velocity

At first I thought c might be correct, but now I am confused. The Earth is a reference frame?

2) You are conducting an experiment inside an elevator that can move in a vertical shaft. A load is hung vertically from the ceiling on a string. The tension in the string is measured to be 10% less than the weight of the load. No other forces are acting on the load. Which of the following statements about the elevator are correct? (> 1 can be correct)

A.The elevator is an inertial frame of reference.
B.The elevator is not an inertial frame of reference.
C.The elevator may be at rest.
D.The elevator may be moving at a constant velocity upward.
E.The elevator may be moving at a constant velocity downward.
F.The elevator must be accelerating.

I think A, C, D, E may be correct, but I am not sure.

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
an inertial frame of reference is anything not accelerating.
I don't have time for # 2. sorry.
 


1) The correct answer is d. A skydiver falling at terminal velocity provides an inertial frame of reference. This is because at terminal velocity, the skydiver is falling at a constant velocity, meaning there is no acceleration and therefore no net force acting on the skydiver. This allows for the skydiver to be used as a reference point for other objects in motion.

2) The correct answers are A, D, and E. The elevator is an inertial frame of reference because there are no external forces acting on the load, meaning it is moving with a constant velocity. The elevator may be at rest or moving at a constant velocity upward or downward, all of which are still considered inertial frames of reference. The elevator does not have to be accelerating, so F is not a correct answer.
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
6K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
2K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
4K