Is a string theory science project feasible in highschool?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the feasibility of high school students researching string theory for science projects, particularly in the context of the Intel Talent Search. Participants unanimously advise against pursuing string theory due to its complex mathematical requirements, which typically include advanced topics such as quantum field theory and infinite series. Instead, they recommend exploring more accessible subjects like the physics of sound, the Schrödinger Wave Equation, or music theory, which can provide a solid foundation in physics and mathematics without overwhelming complexity.

PREREQUISITES
  • Basic understanding of trigonometry
  • Familiarity with quantum theory
  • Knowledge of linear algebra
  • Introduction to wave mechanics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the Schrödinger Wave Equation and its implications in quantum mechanics
  • Explore the physics of sound, including concepts like resonance and diffraction
  • Read "Physics of the Impossible" by Michio Kaku for innovative project ideas
  • Investigate music theory, particularly the mathematical aspects of scales and harmony
USEFUL FOR

High school students interested in physics, music composers looking to integrate scientific principles into their work, and educators seeking project ideas that bridge mathematics and the sciences.

  • #31
A lot of science is knowing what is beyond your current limits. Newton freely admitted
that he couldn't explain what causes gravity, he just took it as a given and calculated the results. My point being, you don't have to solve everything all at once. Take on something that you will be able to learn well and give a solid interpretation of rather than a hasty, general, view of String Theory.
There seems to be a whole school of people out there that are interested in String Theory or QM but they just want to skip the in between and go straight to
a Nobel Prize :P

You have plenty of time. Use it.

SO basically the same as what everyone else is saying.
I vote you do something on music.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
Ok, well regardless of what project I do, does anyone have any recommendations for books I can use to teach myself the math and physics? Right now I'm reading through an old version of Resnick and Halliday's Physics textbook from the 1960s (my Dad's old college textbook). He has an old Calculus book too downstairs. Are those good or too outdated?

I was also wondering if I really need to take Pre-calculus before calculus, or if I can go right to calculus. If I need to know it, can I teach myself Pre-calc and trig in parallel or will they conflict?

EDIT: I think I'll start a new thread for this since it's a little off topic...

Thanks for all the help guys!
 
Last edited:
  • #33
It may help to understand how much physics separates you from a typical graduate student working on string theory.

You need to learn trig and analytic geometry (what used to be called pre-calc). Then there is the Halliday and Resnick book, which typically is covered in two one-semester college classes. At my university, it was normal for physics majors to take 8 additional physics classes and 6 math classes, so you're 18 classes behind. The first two years of grad school are 12 more, bringing you to 30. Theorists would take a couple more specialized ones, so you are about 32 college classes away from getting to where someone would start to think about strings.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K