Is a string theory science project feasible in highschool?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the feasibility of conducting a high school science project on string theory. Participants explore the challenges posed by the advanced mathematics involved, the potential for alternative topics related to physics, and the personal interests of the original poster (OP) in concepts like parallel worlds and baby universes.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Homework-related
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • The OP expresses interest in researching string theory but is uncertain about the mathematical prerequisites, currently only studying trigonometry.
  • Some participants suggest that string theory is too mathematically complex for a high school project, recommending alternative topics instead.
  • One participant mentions that string theory involves advanced concepts such as infinite series and quantum field theory, which may not be suitable for high school students.
  • Another participant proposes exploring the physics of sound as a potentially more accessible topic, highlighting various phenomena related to sound waves.
  • The OP contemplates self-teaching the necessary math within a year to pursue string theory research over the following two years.
  • Some participants recommend starting with topics in quantum mechanics, such as the Schrödinger Wave Equation, as a more manageable alternative to string theory.
  • There is mention of a book, "Physics of the Impossible" by Michio Kaku, as a resource for generating project ideas related to the OP's interests.
  • One participant shares an example of a high school student who successfully published a paper on string theory, suggesting that it is not entirely out of reach.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that string theory may be too advanced for a high school project, but there is no consensus on what alternative topics would be best suited for the OP's interests and abilities. Multiple competing views on the feasibility of string theory research exist.

Contextual Notes

Participants express varying levels of familiarity with the mathematics and concepts involved in string theory and related physics topics. There are indications of personal learning experiences that may affect their perspectives on the OP's ability to tackle such a project.

  • #31
A lot of science is knowing what is beyond your current limits. Newton freely admitted
that he couldn't explain what causes gravity, he just took it as a given and calculated the results. My point being, you don't have to solve everything all at once. Take on something that you will be able to learn well and give a solid interpretation of rather than a hasty, general, view of String Theory.
There seems to be a whole school of people out there that are interested in String Theory or QM but they just want to skip the in between and go straight to
a Nobel Prize :P

You have plenty of time. Use it.

SO basically the same as what everyone else is saying.
I vote you do something on music.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
Ok, well regardless of what project I do, does anyone have any recommendations for books I can use to teach myself the math and physics? Right now I'm reading through an old version of Resnick and Halliday's Physics textbook from the 1960s (my Dad's old college textbook). He has an old Calculus book too downstairs. Are those good or too outdated?

I was also wondering if I really need to take Pre-calculus before calculus, or if I can go right to calculus. If I need to know it, can I teach myself Pre-calc and trig in parallel or will they conflict?

EDIT: I think I'll start a new thread for this since it's a little off topic...

Thanks for all the help guys!
 
Last edited:
  • #33
It may help to understand how much physics separates you from a typical graduate student working on string theory.

You need to learn trig and analytic geometry (what used to be called pre-calc). Then there is the Halliday and Resnick book, which typically is covered in two one-semester college classes. At my university, it was normal for physics majors to take 8 additional physics classes and 6 math classes, so you're 18 classes behind. The first two years of grad school are 12 more, bringing you to 30. Theorists would take a couple more specialized ones, so you are about 32 college classes away from getting to where someone would start to think about strings.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K