Is a Wind Turbine-Powered Building the Future of Energy Generation?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around a proposed design for a wind turbine-powered building that incorporates a large wind turbine and a jet fan system. Participants explore the feasibility of the design, its energy efficiency, and the implications of claiming a self-powered generator. The conversation touches on concepts of energy conservation, perpetual motion, and patent processes.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Meta-discussion

Main Points Raised

  • One participant describes a design using a 2.5MW wind turbine and a large jet fan, claiming it creates a self-powered generator by switching off the diesel generator once the turbine reaches maximum output.
  • Another participant questions the efficiency of the system, arguing that the energy output would not exceed the energy input due to conservation of energy principles.
  • Concerns are raised about the claim of excess energy, with some participants likening it to a perpetual motion machine, which is generally considered impossible under current physical laws.
  • Participants discuss the implications of having a patent pending, with some expressing skepticism about the validity of such patents for perpetual energy systems.
  • There are references to the ease of obtaining a provisional patent and the distinction between having a patent pending and the actual feasibility of the proposed system.
  • Some participants express a desire to see the patent number to evaluate the claims made by the original poster.
  • One participant suggests that the concept of producing more energy than consumed is fundamentally flawed, questioning the practicality of the design.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

There is no consensus among participants. While some engage with the technical aspects of the proposed design, others express skepticism about its feasibility and the implications of claiming excess energy output. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the validity of the claims made about the system's efficiency and the nature of the patent.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight limitations in understanding the energy dynamics of the proposed system, including assumptions about efficiency and the implications of energy conservation laws. The discussion also reflects varying levels of familiarity with patent processes and the nature of perpetual motion claims.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to individuals exploring renewable energy technologies, patent law, and the principles of energy conservation in engineering designs.

  • #31
If the fan provides 750kW of energy, even if we ignore the resistance, the wind turbine could only produce 750kW of energy (that would be 100% efficient and that is not possible). Why can you not grasp this?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
  • #32
Modern technology and mechanical improvments are available now that weren't around before. computer vs abacus
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
43K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
7K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
18K
Replies
17
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K