Is A_{i.j} - A_{j.i} a Tensor Under Non-Linear Transformations?

  • Thread starter Thread starter JohanL
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Tensor
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the properties of tensor expressions, specifically focusing on the expressions A_{i.j} - A_{j.i} and E_{ij.k} + E_{jk.i} + E_{ki.j}. Participants are exploring whether these expressions retain their tensor nature under non-linear transformations.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are attempting to prove the tensor nature of specific expressions and are questioning the implications of non-linear transformations on these proofs. There is also a query about the meaning of the notation used in the expressions.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing insights and raising questions about the nature of non-linear transformations and their effects on the tensor properties of the expressions in question. Some guidance has been offered regarding the interpretation of the notation.

Contextual Notes

There is a mention of partial derivatives in relation to the expressions, and participants are considering how higher-order terms might influence the tensor characteristics under non-linear transformations.

JohanL
Messages
154
Reaction score
0
prove that for any vector

[tex]A_i[/tex]

the expression

[tex]A_{i.j}-A_{j.i}[/tex]

is a tensor, even under non-linear transformations. Similarly prove that for any antisymmetric tensor

[tex]E_{ij}[/tex]

the expression

[tex]E_{ij.k}+E_{jk.i}+E_{ki.j}[/tex]

is a tensor.

____________________________

What does the dots mean?
For example between i and j in i.j ?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Thanks.
I solved the problem except that about
even under non-linear transformations.
non-linear transformations from one set of coordinates to another?
what changes if its non-linear transformations?
 
Maybe non-linear means higher order terms in partials derivitives of the coordinates? They would cancel out in the examples given.
 

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K