Is an Electromagnetic Wave the Same as a Wave in Water or Air?

AI Thread Summary
An electromagnetic wave differs fundamentally from waves in water or air, as it does not involve the movement of particles but instead acts like a wave under certain observations. The photon is the carrier of electromagnetic force, facilitating the propagation of electric and magnetic fields. Magnetism can be viewed as a result of relativistic transformations of electric fields, although not all magnetic fields arise this way. Quantum electrodynamics integrates these concepts, aligning with special relativity and demonstrating compatibility between photons and transformed fields. Understanding these principles clarifies the relationship between electricity, magnetism, and their quantum foundations.
TheTankEngine
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
Wouldn't an electromagnetic wave just be a wave of electrical energy like in water or in air?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Nope. A wave in water or air is the result of the movement of a large number of separate particles. An electromagnetic wave is NOT this. We call it a wave because during certain observations it ACTS like a wave would.
 
I have heard of magnetism and relativity, and how that ties together, but people talking about photons confuses me. Do magnets exchange photons? That wouldn't make sense to me. Are the theory that describes magnetism as a relativistic affect and the theory that uses photons different theories?
 
The carrier of electromagnetic force is the photon. So electric and magentic fields are both propagated via photons. You can think of magnetism as being a consequence of a relativistically transformed electric field but I am of the recollection that not all magnetic fields can be created by transformations from electric fields. In the end, you still need both electric and magnetic fields (or in the case of quantum theory you work with the primitives, the scalar and vector fields, of the electromagnetic field).

The idea of photons is part of the quantum theory of electromagnetics. Quantum electrodynamics using quantum field theory satisfies special relativity. This means that the same relativistic transformations that allow a classical electric field to give rise to a magnetic field in another frame are valid and at work in QFT. So yes, the ideas of photons and transformed fields are compatible since they are present in a common theory.
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top