I Is angular momentum perpendicular to fixed axis of rotation constant?

AI Thread Summary
Angular momentum perpendicular to a fixed axis of rotation is considered constant when torques acting on the system are ignored, assuming sufficient restraints. However, when a rod is hinged and allowed to rotate, the direction of its angular momentum can change at various points during its motion. The discussion raises the question of whether the torques acting perpendicular to the fixed axis also lie within the plane that is perpendicular to that axis. This highlights the complexity of angular momentum behavior in dynamic systems. Understanding these principles is crucial for analyzing rotational motion accurately.
TahirMaqbool
Messages
16
Reaction score
1
TL;DR Summary
Does the component of angular momentum perpendicular to the fixed axis of rotation change in direction or magnitude?
So my book states torques perpendicular to the fixed axis of rotation tend to tilt the axis , however we assume sufficient restraints exist so these torques are simply ignored.
It follows that angular momentum perpendicular to axis remians constant.
(See image )

My question is that if a rod is hinged at one of its ends and allows to rotate, wouldn't angular momentum perpendicular to axis change in direction at each point?
See image below.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_20231228_205312.jpg
    IMG_20231228_205312.jpg
    43.5 KB · Views: 79
  • IMG_20231228_211214.jpg
    IMG_20231228_211214.jpg
    48.3 KB · Views: 88
Physics news on Phys.org
Are those “torques perpendicular to the fixed axis of rotation” also contained in the plane that is “perpendicular to the fixed axis of rotation”?
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Let there be a person in a not yet optimally designed sled at h meters in height. Let this sled free fall but user can steer by tilting their body weight in the sled or by optimal sled shape design point it in some horizontal direction where it is wanted to go - in any horizontal direction but once picked fixed. How to calculate horizontal distance d achievable as function of height h. Thus what is f(h) = d. Put another way, imagine a helicopter rises to a height h, but then shuts off all...
Back
Top