1. Limited time only! Sign up for a free 30min personal tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Is angular SHM also related to UCM ?

  1. Jan 10, 2009 #1
    Hi all,

    I have learned that linear SHM is just projection of UCM onto one axis. Is angular SHM also related to UCM ?

    Moreover, I have also learned that theta = theta0 * sin(wt+P) where theta is angular displacement, theta0 is angular amplitude and P is phase constant. Where does this equation come from, or how can I derive it ?
  2. jcsd
  3. Jan 10, 2009 #2
    Well, I somehow get the idea that they are related..

    Thus instead, "how they are related" would be a better question actually.
  4. Jan 10, 2009 #3
    I guess I need to be more precise. Assume we have a simple pendulum. We say that w = sqrt(g/L). Moreover, we say T = 2PI / w

    It is quite a lot confusing for me to say period is equal to 2PI / w for a simple pendulum. First of all, if the angular displacement was 2PI and w was constant; then it would make sense to say T = 2PI / w . However, w is not constant and the angular displacement is not 2PI..

    Well, if motion is analog to a uniform circular motion in which w is constant and always equal to sqrt(g/L); then it seems to be fine. But I'm not sure about that, too.

    I seriously need some help here.
  5. Jan 10, 2009 #4

    Doc Al

    User Avatar

    Staff: Mentor

    Don't confuse the angular frequency of the pendulum's simple harmonic motion (ω), with the angular speed of the pendulum itself.
  6. Jan 10, 2009 #5
    Hmm, so as far as I understand, angular freq. is constant and angular speed (of pendulum) is variable.

    saying w = sqrt(g/L) ; w is here angular freq. I guess.

    Can we say that angular frequency is actually angular velocity of a UCM(not the pendulum) analog of our SHM in this case ?
  7. Jan 10, 2009 #6

    Doc Al

    User Avatar

    Staff: Mentor

    I don't see why not.

    [tex]x = x_0\sin \omega t[/tex]

    is analogous to

    [tex]\theta = \theta_0\sin \omega t[/tex]

    (You'd have to have the radius of the circular motion represent θ0.)
  8. Jan 10, 2009 #7
    Thanks a lot!

    Now, I would like to prove that

    [tex] w = \sqrt{\frac{g}{L}} [/tex]

    I have tried:

    [tex] Ftan = - mg \sin\theta [/tex]

    (for simple pendulum)


    [tex] a = g \sin\theta[/tex]

    [tex] V = \int g\sin\theta dt[/tex] 0 to t


    [tex] X = \int V dt [/tex] 0 to T/2.


    [tex]X = \theta L[/tex]

    Then; using [tex] w = \frac {2PI} {T} [/tex]

    I would obtain a formula for w -- which hopefully would be equal to

    [tex] w = \sqrt{\frac{g}{L}} [/tex]

    So I guess now the problem is to calculate

    [tex] V = \int g \sin\theta dt[/tex]

    Well, you say that

    [tex]\theta = \theta_0\sin \omega t [/tex]

    but I don't really know why this equation is correct.
    Last edited: Jan 10, 2009
  9. Jan 10, 2009 #8

    Doc Al

    User Avatar

    Staff: Mentor

    That's for a mass on a spring, not a pendulum.

    Why the tan?

    Just: F = -mg sinθ

    Then use a small angle approximation and Newton's 2nd law to set up (then solve) the differential equation.
  10. Jan 10, 2009 #9
Share this great discussion with others via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook