Is Apostol's Calculus enough preparation for advanced physics studies?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Shing
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Book Physics
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the adequacy of Apostol's Calculus as preparation for advanced studies in physics, particularly regarding its coverage of linear algebra, ordinary differential equations (ODE), and their applicability to quantum mechanics as presented in Griffiths's textbook. Participants explore the mathematical foundations necessary for understanding advanced physics concepts.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants assert that Apostol's treatment of linear algebra is excellent and sufficient for physics, especially quantum mechanics.
  • Others argue that Apostol's coverage of ODEs, multivariable calculus, and vector calculus is adequate for undergraduate physics studies.
  • One participant notes that while Apostol's text is strong, it lacks coverage of Fourier series and boundary value problems, which could be beneficial for quantum mechanics.
  • A later reply questions the necessity of the level of mathematics required by Caltech's graduate program, suggesting it may be excessive.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that Apostol's Calculus provides a solid mathematical foundation for studying quantum mechanics, though there are differing opinions on the necessity of certain mathematical topics and the level of rigor required by graduate programs.

Contextual Notes

Some participants mention specific mathematical topics that may not be covered in Apostol's texts, indicating potential gaps in preparation for certain advanced physics courses.

Who May Find This Useful

Students planning to major in physics or those interested in the mathematical foundations necessary for advanced studies in quantum mechanics and related fields.

Shing
Messages
141
Reaction score
1
Hi guys,
recently,
I am planning my college studies plan, majoring in Physics.

I would love to have a solid math background for my physics studies.
I am recently reading Apostol's calculus I.
And I found that actually Apostol's calculus I&II covers linear algebra and ODE,

so my question is:

1.) did Apostol do a good job at explaining LA & DE as well?
2.) Is Apostol's ODE in his Calculus II enough for me to read Griffiths's book on QM?

any other suggestions are welcomed =)

thanks for reading!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Shing said:
Hi guys,
recently,
I am planning my college studies plan, majoring in Physics.

I would love to have a solid math background for my physics studies.
I am recently reading Apostol's calculus I.
And I found that actually Apostol's calculus I&II covers linear algebra and ODE,

so my question is:

1.) did Apostol do a good job at explaining LA & DE as well?
2.) Is Apostol's ODE in his Calculus II enough for me to read Griffiths's book on QM?

any other suggestions are welcomed =)

thanks for reading!

Apostol is an excellent text and does a very good job in explaining Linear Algebra. His exposition on Multivariable calculus will be more than enough to tackle Griffiths. You won't ever need to use concepts such as the 'winding number' any time soon. Go for it!
 
Thanks for replying, anirudh =)
 
I agree.

The coverage of linear algebra in Calculus II by Apostol is extremely good for physics, especially quantum mechanics. Likewise, the coverage of ODEs, multivariable and vector calculus is more than enough for undergrad physics. Griffiths's QM should certainly be doable with this background; most folks who take a class from that book likely have inferior backgrounds. The only piece that Apostol doesn't really cover that could be helpful for QM is Fourier series and boundary value problems, but Griffiths will teach you the main things you need to know about that anyway - it won't be bad with the Apostol background.

good luck,

jason
 
Thanks!

Besides, I would like to ask that how about Modern Quantum Mechanics by Sakurai? What math I will need for it?

And I would also want to ask
that Apostol's Analysis
I don't understand why Caltech's grad school requires that applcants have to be at the level of it, is it not totally unnecessary to have math at that precise level?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
7K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
8K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
7K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K