Regarding to Multi-Variable Calculus Books

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the selection of textbooks for self-studying vector calculus, specifically recommending Hubbard/Hubbard as the primary text and Serge Lang as a supplementary resource. The participant, a college sophomore majoring in mathematics and microbiology, aims to prepare for an upcoming vector calculus course. While some forum members endorse alternative texts such as Apostol's Calculus II, Courant's Calculus & Analysis II, and Marsden & Tromba, the consensus suggests that Hubbard and Lang provide a solid foundation in both theory and application, despite some skepticism regarding Hubbard's presentation style.

PREREQUISITES
  • Familiarity with vector calculus concepts
  • Understanding of introductory analysis, particularly Rudin's Principles of Mathematical Analysis
  • Knowledge of mathematical problem-solving techniques
  • Basic familiarity with manifold theory, as covered in Munkres and Spivak
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the problem sets in Marsden & Tromba for practical application of vector calculus concepts
  • Explore Apostol's Calculus II for a rigorous approach to calculus
  • Investigate Courant's Calculus & Analysis II for a comprehensive understanding of calculus applications
  • Delve into manifold theory through Munkres and Spivak to expand on concepts learned in vector calculus
USEFUL FOR

Students majoring in mathematics, educators preparing for advanced calculus courses, and anyone seeking to deepen their understanding of vector calculus and its applications.

bacte2013
Messages
394
Reaction score
47
Dear Physics Forum personnel,

I am a college sophomore with double majors in mathematics & microbiology and an aspiring analytic number theorist. I will be going to self-study the vector calculus by using Hubbard/Hubbard as a main text and Serge Lang as a supplement to Hubbard; this will help in my current self-studying of intro. analysis (Rudin's PMA, Apostol's MA, and Pugh) and also prepare me for upcoming vector calculus course (computational aspect) that I will take during the Summer. Unfortunately, my math department utilizes is own course packet for that vector calculus course, which is not that good...I am planning to purchase both Hubbard and Lang since I heard that both of them cover theories (with Hubbard using the analysis) and applications well. However, a lot of people on this forum seem to recommend Apostol Calculus II, Courant's Calculus & Analysis II, Fleming, Munkres & Spivak's manifolds, and Marsden. Are those books better than Hubbard and Serge Lang? My initial goal is to learn from Hubbard & Lang, and proceed to Spivak & Munkres's books on manifold analysis.

Please give me your advice and input! I will really appreciate them!

PK
 
Physics news on Phys.org
bacte2013 said:
Dear Physics Forum personnel,

I am a college sophomore with double majors in mathematics & microbiology and an aspiring analytic number theorist. I will be going to self-study the vector calculus by using Hubbard/Hubbard as a main text and Serge Lang as a supplement to Hubbard; this will help in my current self-studying of intro. analysis (Rudin's PMA, Apostol's MA, and Pugh) and also prepare me for upcoming vector calculus course (computational aspect) that I will take during the Summer.

I think it will do more than prepare you. If you did work through those two books, you could perhaps manage to teach that vector calculus course.

Unfortunately, my math department utilizes is own course packet for that vector calculus course, which is not that good...I am planning to purchase both Hubbard and Lang since I heard that both of them cover theories (with Hubbard using the analysis) and applications well. However, a lot of people on this forum seem to recommend Apostol Calculus II, Courant's Calculus & Analysis II, Fleming, Munkres & Spivak's manifolds, and Marsden. Are those books better than Hubbard and Serge Lang?

I can only comment on Marsden & Tromba. It is quite calculational in the sense that a lot of the learning is through problems and repetition. It's good because of the coverage, almost every aspect has problems that test one quite thoroughly. But I wish it was more elegant because it feels sort of crude.

I agree with your choice of Lang, it seems to have good coverage and will have good problems as well. Hubbards, what can I say, I'm skeptical that a subject this difficult can be delivered in a fashion sufficiently perfect to justify the eulogism this book has received.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
8K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
6K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
12K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
11K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
8K