Is Archaeology Always About Digging Down and Does it Imply Earth's Expansion?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Just a though
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Explain
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the misconception that archaeology, which often involves digging down to uncover historical artifacts, implies that the Earth is expanding. Participants highlight that while programs like "Time Team" showcase excavation techniques, there is no scientific evidence supporting the theory of an expanding Earth. The conversation also touches on the role of cosmic dust in Earth's mass and speculates on atmospheric conditions during the time of the dinosaurs, emphasizing that such theories attract unfounded beliefs.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic archaeological methods
  • Familiarity with Earth's geological history
  • Knowledge of atmospheric science related to historical climates
  • Awareness of scientific skepticism regarding fringe theories
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the principles of archaeological excavation techniques
  • Study Earth's geological history and mass changes over time
  • Explore atmospheric composition during the Mesozoic era
  • Investigate the scientific community's stance on expanding Earth theories
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for archaeologists, geologists, historians, and anyone interested in understanding the scientific basis of Earth's history and the validity of various theories regarding its expansion.

Just a though
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Finding out about the past (archaeology) always involves digging down?
Does this mean that the planet we live on is actually expanding?
If you think about the programs on the TV!
E.G. Time team, they are always digging down to find our (the planets) past.
Now considering the above,
Can we explain all this extra matter being added to are planet by cosmic dust?
If so what was the circumference/radius of our planet when the evident meteor impact destroyed the Dinosaurs?
Also at the time would it not be logical that the gravity holding the atmosphere to our planet would favour the heavy gasses?
E.G. Oxygen!? Resulting in a thin layer of gas that our ancestors the mammals could take advantage of?
Just a Thought.
 
Earth sciences news on Phys.org
There is no evidence for an expanding earth. Unfortunately, it is a subject that seems to attract kooks and crackpots. So I would pay it no mind.
 

Similar threads

Is my fictional Solar System stable and realistic?
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
6K
Graduate Sudden Earth Rotation Deceleration Theory
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
Civilization of millions of rings.
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
Writing: Read Only What Does Great Lakes Earth Look Like from Space?
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
Earth Day - My Contact Experience
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
6K
Did UV Radiation from the Sun Cause the Ordovician Extinction?
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
6K
Treatise on Why We Will Never Make Contact, just my opinion.
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Writing: Input Wanted What Makes Great Lakes Earth So Geographically Unique?
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
Undergrad Is Earth Headed for a Dinosaur-Like Extinction?
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
Seaport 2.5 Miles Above Sea Level(?)
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
10K