Is Axiom 2 of Sigma Algebras Equivalent to X Being in the Sigma Field?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter quasar987
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Axioms
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Axiom 2 of sigma algebras, which states that the union of any countable collection of sets in a sigma algebra is also in the sigma algebra, is indeed equivalent to the simpler condition that the entire set X is in the sigma algebra. This conclusion arises from the properties of complements within the sigma algebra, where the inclusion of any set E and its complement E^c guarantees that their union results in the set X. Therefore, if Axiom 2 holds, it follows that X must also be included in the sigma algebra.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of sigma algebras and their properties
  • Familiarity with set theory concepts, including unions and complements
  • Basic knowledge of mathematical logic and implications
  • Experience with countable sets and indexing
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of sigma algebras in detail
  • Explore examples of sigma algebras in probability theory
  • Learn about the relationship between sigma algebras and measurable spaces
  • Investigate the implications of Axiom 1 in sigma algebras
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students of advanced mathematics, and anyone studying measure theory or probability who seeks a deeper understanding of sigma algebras and their axiomatic foundations.

quasar987
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Gold Member
Messages
4,796
Reaction score
32
Wiki says that a sigma algebra (or sigma field) is a subset [itex]\Sigma[/itex] of the powerset of some set X satisfying the following axioms

1) [tex]E\in \Sigma \Rightarrow E^c \in \Sigma[/tex]

2) [tex]E_i \in \Sigma \ \ \forall i \in I \Rightarrow \bigcup_{i\in I}E_i \in \Sigma[/tex]

(where the index set I is countable)

Am I missing something or is axiom 2 equivalent to the much less complicated "2') [itex]X\in \Sigma[/itex]"? Cause for any element of [itex]\Sigma[/itex], since its complement is in [itex]\Sigma[/itex] also, the union of both is X itself. So 2) is satified as soon as 2') is. Conversely, 2) implies that X is in [itex]\Sigma[/itex] simply by taking an element of [itex]\Sigma[/itex] and its complement in the union.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
(2) applies to any sequence of elements of sigma. That includes sequences that don't contain a pair of complementary sets.
 
oh, right!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
92
Views
6K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K