Is body to body gravity scale independent?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the gravitational interaction between bodies of different masses and distances, specifically comparing two solar mass bodies at 1 AU apart with two half-solar mass bodies at half an AU. It is established that while the gravitational force remains constant, the acceleration and time to fall differ significantly. The smaller bodies, due to their proximity and greater acceleration, fall together faster than the larger bodies. The analysis confirms that the time taken for smaller bodies to collide is less than that for larger bodies when considering their respective distances and masses.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Newton's Law of Universal Gravitation
  • Familiarity with gravitational acceleration calculations
  • Basic knowledge of kinematic equations
  • Experience with numerical integration techniques for motion analysis
NEXT STEPS
  • Study Newton's Law of Universal Gravitation in detail
  • Learn about gravitational acceleration and its implications in physics
  • Explore kinematic equations and their applications in gravitational simulations
  • Investigate numerical integration methods for simulating gravitational interactions
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, software developers working on gravity simulations, astrophysicists, and anyone interested in understanding gravitational dynamics between celestial bodies.

dylankarr.com
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
I'm working on a gravity simulator and I can't help but feel that I've done something wrong. Extremely large bodies take a longer time to fall into each other than smaller ones. Is this right? Like for example, if you had to bodies of solar mass at 1 AU apart, would it take a longer, shorter or the same amount of time for two other bodies of half solar mass at half an AU to fall into each other?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
dylankarr.com said:
if you had to bodies of solar mass at 1 AU apart, would it take a longer, shorter or the same amount of time for two other bodies of half solar mass at half an AU to fall into each other?

In the second case (two 0.5-solar mass bodies), the force is 1/4 as much, the acceleration is 1/2 as much, and the time is greater by a factor of \sqrt{2}.
 
dylankarr.com said:
I'm working on a gravity simulator and I can't help but feel that I've done something wrong. Extremely large bodies take a longer time to fall into each other than smaller ones. Is this right? Like for example, if you had to bodies of solar mass at 1 AU apart, would it take a longer, shorter or the same amount of time for two other bodies of half solar mass at half an AU to fall into each other?

In both cases the force is the same, F = \frac{G M_1M_2}{r^2} = \frac{G (M_1/2) (M_2/2)}{(r/2)^2}

The acceleration is different. In the first case:

a = \frac{GM_1}{r^2}

In the second case:

a = \frac{G(M_1/2)}{(r/2)^2} = \frac{2GM_1}{r^2}

so the acceleration is twice that of the first case.

The distance (x) to travel is also half that of the first case, so:

In the first case t= \sqrt{\frac{2x}{a}}

for the time to fall a short distance x relative a large r.

In the second case t = \sqrt{\frac{2(x/2)}{2a}} = \sqrt{\frac{x}{2a}}

which is less time to fall in the second case.

You would of course have to integrate the equations over the total distance for them to come together and the analysis above is just for a short segment of the fall, but overall the smaller closer bodies fall together faster.

If the initial distance apart (r) was the same for the smaller and larger bodies, then the falling time would for the lighter bodies would be longer because:

For the larger bodies t = r\sqrt{\frac{8x}{GM_2}}

and for the smaller bodies t = r\sqrt{\frac{16x}{GM_2}}
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • · Replies 125 ·
5
Replies
125
Views
7K
  • · Replies 51 ·
2
Replies
51
Views
5K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
5K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K