Is Changing My PhD Program After One Month a Wise Career Move?

  • Context: Admissions 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Rudra K
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Career Master Phd
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the decision to change PhD programs after a short period, specifically from material science and engineering to electrical engineering. Participants explore the implications of this change on career prospects, the framing of this decision in statements of purpose for admissions, and the motivations behind the shift in academic focus.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Exploratory

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses a shift in interest from material science and engineering (MSE) to electrical engineering (EE), citing a desire to focus on applications and device optimization rather than material synthesis.
  • Another participant suggests that changing programs early in an academic career is not uncommon and may not have severe repercussions, emphasizing the importance of demonstrating commitment in future applications.
  • Concerns are raised about how to effectively communicate the decision to switch fields in statements of purpose without appearing negative or indecisive.
  • A participant notes that MSE and EE share similarities in nanotechnology and microelectronics, but highlights that EE may offer more practical applications.
  • One contributor mentions the issue of diploma recognition in the participant's home country, where a master's degree is necessary before pursuing a PhD, complicating the transition.
  • There is a discussion about the potential impact of the participant's decision on their employability, particularly given the lack of MSE programs in their country.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views on the implications of changing programs, with some believing it is a reasonable decision while others caution about the perception of commitment. There is no consensus on the best way to frame the situation for admissions committees.

Contextual Notes

Participants acknowledge the complexities involved in transitioning between fields, including personal interests, program recognition, and potential impacts on future academic and career opportunities. Specific assumptions about the job market and academic expectations in different countries are also noted.

Who May Find This Useful

Individuals considering a change in academic focus, particularly those in STEM fields, as well as those navigating the complexities of graduate school admissions and career planning.

Rudra K
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
I started my Ph.D program this year in material science and engineering at a reputed school in the US. After a month I realized that I am more interested in how electrical engineers approach nanotechnology/microelectronics. I liked the idea of applying science to optimize devices and make useful tools out of novel materials.

I realized that most of the work of MSE is focused on synthesizing, characterizing and observing and explaining phenomena in materials, and not really concerned about applications. I also realized that I am not really interested in pursuing a PhD now, and that will not harm my job prospects. However, a job in this field in my country requires an electrical engineering degree.

So I decided to drop out of my program (after 1 month in) since I saw no point in committing to an advisor, and it would be unethical to take funding if my intentions are to leave with a master's degree. I am currently applying to electrical engineering master's programs (self-funded), and I received support from my undergraduate LOR writers.

However, I am not sure how I should frame my situation to admission committees. It seems like no matter how I frame it, it looks bad. How would I frame this in my SOP? Did I ruin my admission chances? I have a good Undergraduate GPA (>3.8) and a year and a half of research experience.

I talked to my UG research advisor and he was not willing to write me a LOR since he believes I had a chance and I below it. I just don't see the point of doing something I am not happy about, let alone wasting others' time and resources. I know my situation is rare but I would really appreciate any advice.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
I also wanted to add that a master's degree will allow me to narrow down my specific research interests if I decided to pursue a PhD in the future.
 
Last edited:
People change their minds, its perhaps poor timing but its very early in the cycle so I don't think it will impact you. I think you can do this once in your academic career without a heavy penalty.

It would have been much worse to switch midway or towards the end but again if you have a serious change of heart then that's what you should tell them. It's important to show that you have sticktoitiveness and that what you say is what you'll do.

Their concern will be about how committed you will be and given your history will you jump again or not.

I think since this is the first time then you are still okay.As an aside:

Sometimes in industry you'll be working at a job and decide you want something better and so apply to another company and get an offer but then your old boss says wait I can do better I'll give you a healthy raise...

The question is do you take your boss’s offer or do you jump?

Its a hard question to answer, but one thing is certain if you accept the boss’s raise and stay, you'll either do well and thrive or your next raise will be significantly delayed or smaller since you forced your old boss’s hand. The other thing is the tactic will likely fail if you do it again a year or two later.

In the case of the new job offer, you could politely decline it and try to keep it open for the next time you decide to leave. Basically, you have a delicate balancing act to keep your options open.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Rudra K
Just a comment on materials engineering - my father managed materials labs for IBM, and the work was all applications oriented. Questions might be related to using an existing material in new conditions and studying how it might respond, or coming up with a new material having properties required for some new device.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman
I totally understand. There is lots of similarity between MSE and EE when it comes to nanotechnology/microelectronics and photonics. but it seems to me that EE is more focused on the application and optimization of devices rather than " here is a material it exhibits so and so, feel free to use it as you like". Another reason for switching to EE, is because MSE does not exist in any university in my country which could affect my employability.
 
Also beside the issues of interest fit, there is the issues of diploma recognition. Back in my country, a masters degree is required before PhD in order for the diploma to be recognized by the ministry of education. Also, MSE is not offered by almost all universities so employers back home are not familiar with the major.

I don't want to turn my SOP into "why I left" so what should I briefly mention to explain my change of field and program?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 50 ·
2
Replies
50
Views
12K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
6K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K