Is dr/dt Always Perpendicular to r for a Unit Vector r(t)?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on proving that for a unit vector \( \vec{r}(t) \), the derivative \( \frac{d\vec{r}}{dt} \) is either zero (indicating \( \vec{r} \) is constant) or perpendicular to \( \vec{r} \). The proof utilizes the product rule of differentiation on the expression \( \vec{r} \cdot \vec{r} = 1 \). By differentiating this equation with respect to time and applying the product rule, it is established that \( \frac{d\vec{r}}{dt} \cdot \vec{r} + \vec{r} \cdot \frac{d\vec{r}}{dt} = 0 \), leading to the conclusion that \( \frac{d\vec{r}}{dt} \) must be perpendicular to \( \vec{r} \) when \( \vec{r} \) is not constant.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of vector calculus and unit vectors
  • Familiarity with differentiation and the product rule
  • Knowledge of dot products and their geometric interpretations
  • Basic concepts of velocity and acceleration in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the product rule of differentiation in vector calculus
  • Learn about the geometric interpretation of dot products
  • Explore the properties of unit vectors and their derivatives
  • Investigate applications of vector derivatives in physics, particularly in motion
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in mathematics and physics, particularly those studying vector calculus and its applications in motion analysis.

Liquidxlax
Messages
312
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement




4. Let r=r(t) be a vector whose length is always 1 (it may vary in direction). Prove that either r is a constant vector or dr/dt is perpendicular to r. hit: differentiate r.r

Homework Equations



basic derivatives with respect to t for velocity and acceleration



The Attempt at a Solution



r = 1 = x + y + z

df = d(r.r) = 2x(df/dx) + 2y(df/dy) + 2z(df/dz)

don't have notes on it yets, so I'm not sure where to go from here.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
One can write \vec{r} = r \hat{r}. You are given that the length is always 1, so what can you conclude about r?

Then note that \vec{r} \cdot \vec{r} = r \hat{r} \cdot r \hat{r} = r^2. Insert the value of r you figured out above, and differentiate this expression with respect to time. You should end up with "thing1 dot thing2 = thing3". What can you conclude about either thing1 or thing2?
 
I presume that by "r= x+ y+ z" you mean
\vec{r}= x\vec{i}+ y\vec{j}+ z\vec{k}

but then that cannot be equal to the number 1!

In any case, you don't want to reduce to components.

Product rule:
\frac{d \vec{r}\cdot\vec{r}}{dt}= \frac{d\vec{r}}{dt}\cdot\vec{r}+ \vec{r}\cdot\frac{d\vec{r}}{dt}= \frac{d(1)}{dt}= 0
 
HallsofIvy said:
I presume that by "r= x+ y+ z" you mean
\vec{r}= x\vec{i}+ y\vec{j}+ z\vec{k}

but then that cannot be equal to the number 1!

In any case, you don't want to reduce to components.

Product rule:
\frac{d \vec{r}\cdot\vec{r}}{dt}= \frac{d\vec{r}}{dt}\cdot\vec{r}+ \vec{r}\cdot\frac{d\vec{r}}{dt}= \frac{d(1)}{dt}= 0

okay, thanks that seems to make sense
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K