Is electric electrons and protons?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the movement of electrons and protons in electrical circuits, exploring the nature of electric current, charge carriers, and historical conventions in defining charge movement. It encompasses theoretical and conceptual aspects of electrodynamics and circuit behavior.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants assert that only electrons move in an electric circuit, while protons remain stationary.
  • Others argue that the convention of positive charge movement is a simplification, as electrons flow in the opposite direction to the defined current.
  • A participant suggests that at a quantum level, protons represent the material structure while electrons move through them.
  • It is noted that electron motion is random and slow, with average drift velocities being much lower than the speed of electromagnetic waves in circuits.
  • Some participants highlight that in different contexts, such as electrolytes, both positive and negative ions can serve as charge carriers.
  • Historical context is provided regarding Benjamin Franklin's arbitrary assignment of positive and negative charges, leading to confusion about charge movement in circuits.
  • One participant mentions that in practical circuits, the specific nature of charge carriers may be less relevant than the overall current flow.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the movement of charges in circuits, with no consensus reached on whether protons move or the implications of charge conventions. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the interpretation of charge movement and the relevance of historical definitions.

Contextual Notes

Participants acknowledge that the understanding of charge movement may depend on the specific context of the circuit, such as whether it involves metals or electrolytes. Additionally, the discussion reflects varying interpretations of historical conventions and their impact on current understanding.

seb7
Messages
66
Reaction score
0
In an electrical circuit, I hear a lot about the positive charge drift, but in my mind, I'm sure its only the electrons that actually move. Do protons move in an electric circuit?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No.By convention,we postulate that it is positive charges that move in an electric circuit and create an electric current,thus charges move in the same direction just as the current.
 
victorphy said:
No.By convention,we postulate that it is positive charges that move in an electric circuit and create an electric current,thus charges move in the same direction just as the current.

To the best of my knowledge no one has ever postulated positive charges. In the positive current convention charges (electrons) flow in the opposite direction of current. For the purpose of circuits it simply does not matter which direction you define current flow, as long as you are consistent the results are the same.
 
Last edited:
My thinking is that at a quantum level the protons are actually the material itself, while the electrons are bouncing through the protons.
 
Actually, at the quantum level it is best not to think about the electrons moving either.
They DO move due to the electric field; but their motion is pretty much random and the average drift velocity is only a few cm per second; much slower than the speed at which the electromagnetic wave travels through a circuit (i.e. the speed of light).
There are systems where electricity is actually conducted via ballistic particles, but that is an expection and not somethig you find in ordinary circuits.
 
In electrodynamics, it is just as valid to think of a current of negative charges moving in one direction as it is for a current of positive charges moving in the opposite direction, the math works the same way.

The whole negative/positive confusion came from the early studies of electricity and magnetism. Legend has it that it was Benjamin Franklin that defined positive arbitrarily as the charge left on a glass rod after being rubbed with silk. It wasn't until later that people figured out that it was the negative charge that actually moved.
 
From a letter dated Sept. 1, 1747, written by Franklin to a friend in London, and later published in his "Experiments and Observations on Electricity" (1751):

Benjamin Franklin said:
...Hence have arisen some new terms among us: we say, B, (and bodies like circumstanced) is electrised positively; A, negatively. Or rather, B is electrised plus; A, minus...

(page 15 in the book)
 
In metals the charge carriers are electrons, but in electrolytes (including batteries) the charge carriers are positively and negatively charged ions. So many practical circuits will have a mix of positive and negative charge carriers. For most purposes the nature of the charge carriers is irrelevant and it is sufficient to just think about the current.
 
Post #8 is correct and a good way to think about "current flow". Electrons can slowly migrate in a typical wire based circuit because with conductors of electricity, outer bound electrons are loosly held in place...that's what a conductor means...there are some electrons available for current. In an insulator all electrons are tightly bound to their nucleus and so they are held in place unless very high voltages are applied...

Wikipedia says it this way under electrical insulators:
An insulator, also called a dielectric, is a material that resists the flow of electric current. An insulating material has atoms with tightly bonded valence electrons.

Another important electrolytic environment is sea water (salt water) where all sorts of ions (charged particles) take part in the disintegration of underwater metals on boats. Large ships, for example, have active cathodic protection systems which apply a voltage to parts of the hull because the movement of the ship thru water creates currents harmful to underwater metals in an electrolyte.
 
  • #10
jtbell said:
From a letter dated Sept. 1, 1747, written by Franklin to a friend in London, and later published in his "Experiments and Observations on Electricity" (1751):



(page 15 in the book)

Yeah, Ben Franklin was the man that decided that electrons were to be considered the "negative" charge, and since there weren't any well understood means of finding out which charges were actually moving in circuits, he had a 50/50 chance of making the sign convention simple. Unfortunately, most circuits have negative charge carriers moving. Luckily for us though, a negative charge moving in one direction can be considered as a positive charge moving in the opposite direction (in the case of circuits, at least).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
713
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K