Is "energetics" the same as "thermodynamics"?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the distinction between "energetics" and "thermodynamics," with some participants questioning the reliability of the Wikipedia article that describes energetics as a generalization of thermodynamics. There is skepticism about the term "energetics," with some considering it outdated and not commonly found in modern textbooks. The term "bio-energetics" is mentioned as a more contemporary usage, particularly in the context of life sciences, where it focuses less on heat energy. Additionally, the term "energetics" appears to have various interpretations, including associations with sportswear in online searches. Overall, the conversation highlights a lack of consensus on the relevance and application of "energetics" compared to thermodynamics.
bunchie
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
If so, why do people use the word "energetics"?
 
Science news on Phys.org
Where did you see the term "energetics" used?
 
Doc Al said:
Where did you see the term "energetics" used?
The Wikipedia article on "energetics" states it as a sort of generalization of thermodynamics. However, it is in big need for further contributions and doesn't look very reliable. It doesn't even exist in my language.
 
fresh_42 said:
The Wikipedia article on "energetics" states it as a sort of generalization of thermodynamics.
Yes, I saw that and dismissed it as junk. "Energetics" might be an old-fashioned term. I've not seen it in any textbook I've used.
 
Doc Al said:
Yes, I saw that and dismissed it as junk. "Energetics" might be an old-fashioned term. I've not seen it in any textbook I've used.
It might as well be a very modern term: Googling it gave me a lot of sports wear and related stuff! :smile: But Google is country sensitive ...
 
The word "bio-energetics" is used by Nick Lane in his book, "The Vital Question: Why Is Life The Way It Is?", that Bill Gates is reading or has read.
 
I think it's because "bio-energetics" doesn't involve heat a lot, which "thermodynamics" seems to imply is the most important form of energy?
 

Similar threads

B What Happens to Very Energetic Protons After Collision?
Replies
16
Views
2K
I Movable Wall in an Adiabatic System: Same Final Temperature?
Replies
8
Views
1K
Gibbs energy for Lithiation in Lithium batteries
Replies
10
Views
4K
I Thermodynamic constant -- misunderstanding
Replies
7
Views
2K
I Paradox: Thermodynamic equilibrium does not exist in gravitational fields
3
Replies
135
Views
7K
I Book suggestions for classical thermodynamics
Replies
6
Views
1K
Thermodynamic Axioms: Establishing Temperature, Internal Energy & Entropy
Replies
1
Views
1K
I An experiment against the second law of thermodynamics
Replies
37
Views
4K
I Minimization of thermodynamic equilibrium
Replies
3
Views
2K
I Interesting Thermodynamics Problem deleted in PhysicsStackExchange
Replies
13
Views
3K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top