Is Energy Conserved in a Falling Yo-Yo?

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
4 replies · 2K views
estro
Messages
239
Reaction score
0
Suppose that I hold a Yo-Yo and then I leave it to fall [and of course rotate] holding only the string.
I seems to me that the energy [not the whole of the potential energy will be converted to [itex](1/2)mv^2+(1/2)I\omega^2[/itex]] is not conserved, because of the force the string applies on the Yo-Yo.
Is my intuition is right?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
estro said:
Suppose that I hold a Yo-Yo and then I leave it to fall [and of course rotate] holding only the string.
I seems to me that the energy [not the whole of the potential energy will be converted to [itex](1/2)mv^2+(1/2)I\omega^2[/itex]] is not conserved, because of the force the string applies on the Yo-Yo.
Is my intuition is right?
I would say no. Just because the string exerts a force on the yo-yo does not mean that work is being done. Consider the speed of the end of the string as it unravels.
 
Doc Al said:
I would say no. Just because the string exerts a force on the yo-yo does not mean that work is being done. Consider the speed of the end of the string as it unravels.

Regarding what you said about the work:
The yo-yo goes down so the string force does negative work. So the force does not "spend" energy, right?

Regarding speed of the string:
The string has no speed after it unravels, but I don't understand how is this related to work. As work is only [itex]F\centerdot \Delta x[/itex]
 
estro said:
Regarding what you said about the work:
The yo-yo goes down so the string force does negative work. So the force does not "spend" energy, right?

Regarding speed of the string:
The string has no speed after it unravels, but I don't understand how is this related to work. As work is only [itex]F\centerdot \Delta x[/itex]
Work is better thought of as [itex]F\centerdot \Delta x[/itex], where [itex]\Delta x[/itex] is the displacement of the point of application of that force. But the point of application is not moving.

You can certainly calculate [itex]F_{net}\centerdot \Delta x_{cm}[/itex], but that's not the same thing as the work done by the forces.
 
Doc Al said:
Work is better thought of as [itex]F\centerdot \Delta x[/itex], where [itex]\Delta x[/itex] is the displacement of the point of application of that force. But the point of application is not moving.

You can certainly calculate [itex]F_{net}\centerdot \Delta x_{cm}[/itex], but that's not the same thing as the work done by the forces.

Great explanation [cleared a lot of confusion for me], thanks!