Is f Integrable on [0,3] with Integral Value of 3?

  • Thread starter Thread starter snipez90
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The function f defined on the interval [0,3] is integrable, with f(x) = 1 for x in [0,3) and f(3) = 17. A partition P = {0, 3 - e/32, 3} was utilized to demonstrate that the upper sum U(f,P) equals 3 + e/2 and the lower sum L(f,P) equals 3. The difference between the upper and lower sums, U(f,P) - L(f,P), is less than e, confirming the integrability of f. Consequently, the integral value of f over [0,3] is conclusively 3.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Riemann integrability
  • Familiarity with upper and lower sums
  • Knowledge of partitioning intervals in calculus
  • Basic concepts of limits and epsilon-delta definitions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study Riemann integrability criteria in detail
  • Learn about constructing partitions for integrable functions
  • Explore the implications of discontinuities on integrability
  • Investigate the epsilon-delta definition of limits in calculus
USEFUL FOR

Students of calculus, mathematics educators, and anyone interested in understanding the principles of Riemann integration and function behavior on closed intervals.

snipez90
Messages
1,095
Reaction score
5

Homework Statement


Let f be a function on [0,3] so that f(x) = 1, for x in [0,3); 17, for x = 3. Show that f is integrable on [0,3] and the value of the integral is 3.


Homework Equations


Upper and lower sums


3. The attempt iat a solution
I think this is a valid proof. Let e > 0. Define a partition P = {0, 3 - e/32, 3}.

Then U(f,P) = 1*(3 - e/32) + 17*(e/32) = 3 + e/2. Clearly, L(f,P) = 3. Hence, U(f,P) - L(f,P) = e/2 < e. Hence f is integrable.

Now [tex]L(f,P) \leq 3 \leq U(f,P)[/tex]. Since f is integrable, there is only one number between all the lower and upper sums, hence the value of the integral is 3.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think that works just fine.
 
Hmmm, cool. The only real change I made to this in the actual proof is letting e' = min{1,e}, in case someone wanted to choose a morbidly large epsilon.
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K