htg
- 107
- 0
The issue is that textbooks (e.g. Griffiths: Introduction to electrodynamics) say that divergence of magnetization at the end of a magnet is infinite.
Gauss' Law, a fundamental principle of electromagnetism, is confirmed to hold for all source charge motions and various flux integration surfaces, including spheres, ellipsoids, and non-standard shapes like eggs. Despite traditional texts like Feynman and Griffiths stating its applicability is limited to electrostatics, the discussion reveals that Gauss' Law remains valid in dynamic scenarios, provided it is used alongside other Maxwell's equations. The participants agree that while the electric field from a moving charge does not conform to the 1/r² dependency, Gauss' Law itself is not violated. The consensus is that Gauss' Law is universally applicable in classical electrodynamics.
PREREQUISITESPhysicists, electrical engineers, and students of electromagnetism seeking to deepen their understanding of Gauss' Law and its applications in both static and dynamic electric fields.
htg said:The issue is that textbooks (e.g. Griffiths: Introduction to electrodynamics) say that divergence of magnetization at the end of a magnet is infinite.
Griffiths said:since M and H are [in linear media] proportional to B, does it not follow that their divergence, like B's must always vanish? Unfortunately, it does not: at the boundary between two materials of different permeability the divergence of M can actually be infinite. For instance, at the end of a cylinder of linear paramagnetic material, M is zero on one side but not on the other.
jtbell said:Third edition, page 276:
\nabla \cdot \vec M and \nabla \cdot \vec H being infinite simply reflects the idealization of the boundary as being perfectly "sharp," with M and H changing "instantaneously" as you cross the boundary.
jtbell said:Third edition, page 276:
\nabla \cdot \vec M and \nabla \cdot \vec H being infinite simply reflects the idealization of the boundary as being perfectly "sharp," with M and H changing "instantaneously" as you cross the boundary.