Is Gravity a Result of Other Forces at Work?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Azmodii
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gravity
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the idea that gravity may not be a fundamental force but rather a result of other forces at work. Participants explore the implications of this hypothesis, referencing concepts from superstring theory and relativity, while also addressing the challenges of presenting personal theories in a scientific context.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Meta-discussion

Main Points Raised

  • One participant proposes that gravity is not a constant force but a result of other forces, suggesting that their equation accurately measures gravitational forces.
  • Another participant expresses skepticism about the validity of personal theories without formal presentation, referencing a previous debate with someone who made similar claims without proper formalism.
  • A third participant emphasizes the importance of adhering to site guidelines regarding personal theories and suggests that discussions should be reserved for published work.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus. There is skepticism regarding the validity of personal theories, and the discussion remains unresolved with competing views on the nature of gravity.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights limitations in presenting personal theories without formal validation and the challenges of engaging with speculative ideas in a scientific forum.

Azmodii
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I Have Been Toying With The Idea That Gravity Itself Is Not A Constant Force And Is In Fact A Result Of Other Forces At Work. I Have Passed My Work Onto My Professor And He Is Very Interested And Thinks I May Be Onto Something Big. He Has Passed My Equation On To Several Other Physicians.

I Cant Reveal My Work, However I Would Like A Manner Of Opinions On This Subject.

Heres The Rundown.

I Dont Like The Superstring Theories Idea Of Gravitons As The Main Reason For Gravitational Forces, As Gravity Is Refered To As A Constant Of Sorts, And If That Was So, The Equal/Inequal Equation Would Result In A Stalemate, As The Inequal Is Equal. If You Run With The Anti Matter Idea, Then The Result Is Nothing, As Annihilation Occurs When The Two Act Together.

I Prefer To Think That The Answer Is Another Similar Force That Can Manipulate Gravity Itself, You Can Try It At Home, They Use It On The Space Station, They Use It In Zero-G Chambers At NASA, But No One Has Stopped To Ponder If The Force They Are Using To Inhibit Gravity Is In Fact The Cause?

In Every Case, My Equation Has Been Entirely Correct In Measuring Gravity, And Gravitational Forces, Applied To Any Object.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
And Yes I Know The Superstring Theory Has Answers, But None Are As Seamless As Relativity, Where As, My Equation Is Seamless And To Put It In Perspective, Tiny And Simple.
 
Here's an opinion:

I've just finish debating one bloke who also claimed he had found a "simple" explanation for the cause of gravity and who posted absolutely no symbolical formalism, who only spoke in tall words... much like what you have postet here

In the end he was finally forced to admit that he hadn't got the slightes clue what he was talking about...

If you can't reveal what this is about, then I can't give you any sincere opinion... that's it.
 
Please read our site guide lines regarding personal theories. When your work is published in an acceptable journal feel free to come back.

Thead locked.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
696
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
6K
  • · Replies 51 ·
2
Replies
51
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K