Is $h(x)$ a linear polynomial?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ackbach
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the polynomial function $h(x)$ with integer coefficients, specifically examining its injectivity modulo $p^2$ and $p^3$. It is established that if $h(0), h(1), \dots, h(p^2-1)$ are distinct modulo $p^2$, then $h(0), h(1), \dots, h(p^3-1)$ are also distinct modulo $p^3$. The proof involves demonstrating that the function $g(x) = h(x) - a$ is bijective, leading to the conclusion that $h(x)$ must be surjective on $\mathbb{Z}/p^3$. The discussion concludes with a conjecture questioning whether $h(x)$ must be a linear polynomial.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of polynomial functions and their properties
  • Familiarity with modular arithmetic, particularly modulo prime powers
  • Knowledge of bijective functions and their implications in finite sets
  • Concept of Hensel's lemma for lifting roots in modular arithmetic
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of injective and surjective functions in the context of finite fields
  • Learn about Hensel's lemma and its applications in number theory
  • Explore the implications of polynomial roots in modular arithmetic
  • Investigate the characteristics of linear polynomials and their behavior under modular constraints
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, number theorists, and students interested in polynomial functions, modular arithmetic, and their applications in advanced mathematics.

Ackbach
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
4,148
Reaction score
94
Here is this week's POTW:

-----

Let $p$ be a prime number. Let $h(x)$ be a polynomial with integer coefficients such that $h(0), \, h(1), \, \dots, \, h(p^2-1)$ are distinct modulo $p^2$. Show that $h(0), \, h(1), \, \dots, \, h(p^3-1)$ are distinct modulo $p^3$.

-----

Remember to read the http://www.mathhelpboards.com/showthread.php?772-Problem-of-the-Week-%28POTW%29-Procedure-and-Guidelines to find out how to http://www.mathhelpboards.com/forms.php?do=form&fid=2!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Congratulations to castor28 for his correct solution to this week's POTW, which was Problem B-4 in the 2008 Putnam Archive. The solution follows.

[sp]We are told that the function $h(x)$ is injective on $\mathbb{Z}/p^2$ and asked to prove that the same is true on $\mathbb{Z}/p^3$. Since, in either case, the domain and co-domain are the same finite set, injective is equivalent to surjective (and bijective). We will prove that $h(x)$ is surjective on $\mathbb{Z}/p^3$.

Choose $a\in\mathbb{Z}$. We must prove that the congruence $h(x)\equiv a\pmod{p^3}$ has a solution, or that $g(x)$ has a root modulo $p^3$, where $g(x)=h(x)-a$; $g(x)$ is also bijective.

Because $g(x)$ is also bijective on $\mathbb{Z}/p$, there is a $b$ such that $g(b)\equiv0\pmod{p}$. If we write $f(x)=g(x+b)$ (another bijective function), we have $f(0)\equiv0\pmod{p}$.

Since $p$ is prime, we have the factorization:

$$f(x)\equiv x^k t(x) \pmod{p}$$

Because $f(x)$ is bijective, $x=0$ is the only root, and $t(x)\not\equiv0\pmod{p}$ for all $x\not\equiv0\pmod{p}$.

We show now that $k=1$. Since $f(x)$ is surjective modulo $p^2$, there must be a $y$ with $f(y)\equiv p\pmod{p^2}$. Since $t(y)\not\equiv0\pmod{p}$ for all $y\not\equiv0\pmod{p}$, we have $y\equiv0\pmod{p}$; if $k>1$, $f(y)\equiv0\pmod{p^2}$, a contradiction.

Because $k=1$, $x=0$ is a simple root modulo $p$, and we can use Hensel's lifting to lift that root to a root modulo $p^3$.

Conjecture: Could it be true that $h(x)$ must be linear ?
[/sp]
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K