Is heat's velocity constant like light's?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the nature of heat and its relationship with electromagnetic radiation, specifically infrared (IR) radiation. Participants clarify that while heat can be transferred via radiation, it is not synonymous with radiation itself; heat refers to the internal energy of particles in a substance. The conversation highlights the distinction between heat as the kinetic energy of particles and the role of radiation as a means of energy transfer. Ultimately, the consensus is that heat transfer mechanisms include conduction, convection, and radiation, each with distinct characteristics and definitions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of thermodynamics and energy transfer mechanisms
  • Familiarity with electromagnetic radiation, particularly infrared radiation
  • Knowledge of kinetic energy and particle motion
  • Basic concepts of conduction and convection in heat transfer
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the laws of thermodynamics and their implications on heat transfer
  • Explore the differences between conduction, convection, and radiation in detail
  • Learn about the Boltzmann transport equation and its relevance to heat transfer
  • Investigate the role of infrared radiation in thermal energy transfer and its applications
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, engineers, and students of thermodynamics seeking to deepen their understanding of heat transfer mechanisms and the distinctions between heat and electromagnetic radiation.

  • #31
dirtyd33 said:
But this is what I am supposing, is that because absorbed infrared increases the same internal energy that is being increased via conduction that the two are roughly equivalent; that the increased internal energy of the particle is due to addition of photon masses, whether absorbed from radiation or conducted from direct contact of "macro" bodies. Zz, please don't get on my case about "overly speculative posts," I'm trying to conduct research and further my own understanding.

You are conducting {no pun intended} your own research by making unverified claims. Where did you do your research to allow you to deduce everything you wrote in this post? Throughout this thread, you've provided not a single valid reference to support your claim.

This thread started with a question. But somehow, when provided with the answers, you are trying to dispute those by providing your own answers. It appears that you've already made up your mind what the answer should be. So I have serious doubts that this has anything to do with conducting research, but I do think it is your means of furthering your own misunderstanding.

Zz.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K