"What will happen when Hillary is having PMS and her husband is off with some other chick and she is under pressure to push or not push the red button?" W3pcq
You know it’s a legit point; of course, a little bit extreme (quite insensitive). However, I don’t know much about female biological system. Does she still have PMS at this age (60, correct me if I wrong).
Honestly, I use to like the Clinton during her spousal’s eight years in Office. I don’t know much about Hillary Clinton, only to know she has the ability to stick by the man who cheated on her [of course, this indicates how determine towards her goal to whatever extent]. I have always liked the Clinton, especially comparable to (2nd) Bush administration. I still like her even when she ran for the Senate in New York. However, I realize something recently since her campaign for Presidential candidate. I realize she’s an absolute determine woman on achieving her goal and she will do anything and will stop at nothing to achieve those goal. Of course, many will say what is wrong with having a determine goal, I say nothing is wrong with a dream and personal goals. However, the issue that crops up would be of concern is to what level of honesty, truthfulness, fairness, and morality, etc. However, a disclaimer, this is only my opinion and my perception of her and some of the other politicians. Other people may have different level of human indifference and intolerance.
There’s no doubt, she’s a very intelligent candidate, excellent debater, and dedicated politician (some may viewed as experienced). She also a very skillful (in my opinion I lean towards the word crafty) in many of her debates for she has skill and great understanding in human psychology. Furthermore, I have no doubts she’s compassionate in many positive things she did during her time at Wal Mart, White House, and in the Senate and into the future. I believe, through thick and thin she has endured from the college years and her life with Bill (womanizer) and able to continually achieve her goal-not too many women can do that. It’s awe inspiring; however, on the other hand, one can imagine what she must have been doing something to achieve these goals. I leave up to your imagination. It is not up to me imply something in the past and things that I don’t have an understanding of. However, I will pinpoint some thing that she did recently that is considered low level of dignity, honesty, trustworthy, and fairness.
1. Teary emotional outburst – Many will make the argument that it is compassionate and sincere emotion. Her compassion to this campaign for children, healthcare, soldiers dying (you’ll be judge about this one), etc… It is legit to have emotional outbreak especially in women. However, when emotion is mixed with the intent to derail the another opponent, personally, it is unacceptable. The true nature of human psychology, when you’re in state of emotional distress, it’s hard to be in contempt of another human being because the insecurity you have within yourself. However, in Clinton case she has the ability to tear-up and at the same time indirectly exposing the negative imagery of Obama. The only conclusion, she’s playing to the audience (mainly women) who are gullible. However, from my experience with women emotions, when they become emotional, they are angry, sad, or silent. They are honest and truthful in their emotion whether positive or negative.
Furthermore, she has endure so much (only my presumption) in the past, especially during Bill misadventure with women and she handled pretty well. Why now, just loosing one state (IOWA) out of 50. Again, if she made an emotional plea or well up like she did recently prior to Super Tuesday. It would be more understandable, it’s genuine, maybe. To some it might be nothing. However, one has to remember we want someone who has the highest level of dignity, honesty, and trustworthy to be seated in the White House. Then again, we’re talking about politicians.
2. Using Bill as Hound dog, to be a former President of greatest nation in the world and to be prestigiously, award for many humanitarian aide around the world and now he’s being used in a political game. There’s nothing wrong with supporting your spouse; however, when you go and intentionally make false and inaccurate statements, it is somewhat like hitting below the belt when the referee looks the other way. How would he be able to represent the US causes? It just doesn’t look bad on Bill or our politicians, but on our nation as well. Well, in the state which America’s in there’s nothing that Clintons do would be as bad!
3. By nature, I think Hillary is very crafty. Again, this is my personal perception only. Listen to her debate, where’s she arguing about her vote to use military force. She doesn’t admit her failure, but rather use her crafty argument against what is undeniable. It’s like Mitt Romney trying to explain that he “SAW” his father was marching with MLKJ. Listen to her explaining her switching position on driver license. It took her months to change position because it controversial in her state; yet, she comes back with a smooth turnaround on Obama for his difficulty trying to explain his position with only 2 or 3 minutes delay (that because host doesn’t allow him to explain his DL positioning ).
These are some of the highlights which seem obvious, some are not so obvious unless you thoroughly followed through the debate. One could argue, it just a political game. Are we living in “dog eat dog,” if it is, yes we can go down to that level, but once we are down in that level it could never comeback it will remain the standard of our dignity, truthfulness, trustworthiness and fairness in everything we all do.
Again, I’m not bias against women. This is my view, and I don’t expect anyone to adhere to this view. But I only ask you to step outside the box of the underlying prejudice (gender, race, etc.) and look at these candidates very carefully every words coming from their mouth. People say “vote with your guts”, PLEASE DON'T rather please “vote with you brain.” You are in an informational age; all the information is at your disposal. Transcend above the boundary that limits us in the past and look toward the future with wisdom.
. Bush qualified in an F-102 when the latest jet was the F4 or F-104. That ensured he wouldn't go to Nam. IIRC, he was in the Air National Guard, and then left to help in a political campaign. Bush dishonors the real vets.