Is Inertia Quantifiable and Measured by SI Units?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Gib Z
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Inertia Mass Matter
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the quantifiability of inertia and its relationship to mass, exploring whether inertia can be measured in SI units. Participants express confusion regarding the definitions and implications of inertia as a property of mass, and how it relates to concepts like density and force.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants assert that mass is a measure of inertia, while others express confusion about this relationship and question the validity of their understanding.
  • A participant compares inertia to properties like density and electric charge, suggesting that properties can be quantified.
  • One participant argues that inertia is not an SI unit and emphasizes that it is a property of matter that resists acceleration, as stated in Newton's first law.
  • Another participant seeks a mathematical definition of mass and inertia, expressing dissatisfaction with existing definitions.
  • Some participants discuss the historical context of definitions and how they may lead to confusion in understanding inertia and mass.
  • There are references to the definition of mass as a base unit in the SI system, with clarifications on its distinction from derived units like force.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on whether inertia is quantifiable or how it should be defined in relation to mass. Multiple competing views remain regarding the definitions and implications of inertia and mass.

Contextual Notes

There are unresolved issues regarding the definitions of inertia and mass, the relationship between these concepts, and the implications of using historical versus contemporary definitions in physics.

  • #31
If the definition of inertia includes changes in momentum, by its definition how do interactions of photons (non-inertial) or masses (inertial) differ otherwise?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
Photons and mass are two different subjects. They both 'obey' the geometric properties of spacetime though. That is, both will 'bend' to gravity. Photons have what's called an instant acceleration, relative or rest mass do not. Otherwise I agree in that it is a 'muddy' question :)

We can slow down light and even stop it, when we do that it disappear, as far as I understand, only to show itself when we accelerate it again. Then again, I might be wrong here. On the other hand, electrons are not defined particles either, they just have a probability focus, right:)

And inertia is a property of relative / rest mass which differs from photons instant acceleration. But I have problems with exchanging mass for inertia as inertia is a intangible property concurring from mass, whereas mass does not, as far as I know, create itself by experience inertia.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
7K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
5K
  • · Replies 60 ·
3
Replies
60
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
11K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
3K