Number Theory Is Introduction to Theory of Numbers by Hardy good ?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the suitability of "Introduction to the Theory of Numbers" by G.H. Hardy for undergraduate students interested in number theory. Participants agree that Hardy's text requires a strong background in advanced calculus and complex analysis, making it unsuitable for those with only basic knowledge. Recommendations for more accessible alternatives include "Elementary Number Theory" by D. Burton, "Elementary Number Theory with Applications" by T. Koshy, "Elementary Methods in Number Theory" by M. Nathanson, and "Introduction to Analytic Number Theory" by T. Apostol. These texts are deemed more appropriate for undergraduates seeking to build foundational knowledge in number theory.

PREREQUISITES
  • Basic understanding of calculus
  • Familiarity with mathematical proof techniques
  • Knowledge of number theory symbols and notation
  • Introductory concepts in complex analysis
NEXT STEPS
  • Study "Elementary Number Theory" by D. Burton for foundational concepts
  • Explore "Elementary Number Theory with Applications" by T. Koshy to enhance proof skills
  • Read "Elementary Methods in Number Theory" by M. Nathanson for a deeper dive into analytic number theory
  • Investigate "Introduction to Analytic Number Theory" by T. Apostol for advanced topics
USEFUL FOR

Undergraduate students, mathematics enthusiasts, and anyone seeking to enhance their understanding of number theory without a strong background in advanced calculus.

Ling Min Hao
Messages
22
Reaction score
0
I am currently an undergraduate students at university and i am keen on learning some mathematics that is not taught in school and i have chosen number theory as my main topic . Recently I have picked number theory by Hardy but I found it is quite hard to understand sometimes as I have quite a lot of symbols and notation that I don't understand like (big O , little o , f=O(phi) means that mod(f) < A(phi) ) . Should I continue on learning this book or any other book recommendations which is more suitable for undergraduates with light knowledge on calculus and algebra?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Here's some discussion on it:

http://math.stackexchange.com/questions/329/best-book-ever-on-number-theory

and they recommend:

https://www.amazon.com/dp/038797329X/?tag=pfamazon01-20 by Ireland and Rosen

although this is a graduate level text.

Another one I found was this one by Prof of Mathematics William Stein of the Univ of Washington:

http://wstein.org/ent/

while I can't vouch for these references personally the Stein book is freely downloadable and could get you started on your topic.

@micromass, @Mark44 or @Krylov may have better references for undergrads.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The only book I have on number theory is one I got for a class in 1976, "Elements of Number Theory," by Anthony Petto frezzo and Donald Byrkit. That's the only number theory book I have. Amazon shows a 2nd edition of this book, and the one review it got was 5 stars.
 
If you do not have strong background in calculus, then Hardy/Wright is definitely not a suitable book for you; in order to read it, you need to have a strong grasp of the advanced calculus and some knowledge from complex analysis. If you would like gentler books, then I have some suggestions:

Elementary Number Theory by D. Burton
Elementary Number Theory with Applications by T. Koshy
Elementary Methods in Number Theory by M. Nathanson
Introduction to Analytic Number Theory by T. Apostol

If you did not yet mastered basic proof techniques, you can actually learn them with Burton and Koshy. They are very gentle books that will also teach and sharpen your proof skills.

Nathanson is not quite gentle as it assumes you have elementary knowledge in the advanced calculus, but you can learn the necessary concepts as you read (he also teaches you some basics like Fourier analysis). He covers basics of elementary number theory, followed by good overview of the analytic number theory (mostly multiplicative). After reading his book, you can actually jump to his two-volume set in the additive number theory, which covers Goldbach Conjecture and Waring Theorem.

Apostol is not quite gentle either but you could learn first few chapters well.
 
bacte2013 said:
If you do not have strong background in calculus, then Hardy/Wright is definitely not a suitable book for you; in order to read it, you need to have a strong grasp of the advanced calculus and some knowledge from complex analysis. If you would like gentler books, then I have some suggestions:

Elementary Number Theory by D. Burton
Elementary Number Theory with Applications by T. Koshy
Elementary Methods in Number Theory by M. Nathanson
Introduction to Analytic Number Theory by T. Apostol

If you did not yet mastered basic proof techniques, you can actually learn them with Burton and Koshy. They are very gentle books that will also teach and sharpen your proof skills.

Nathanson is not quite gentle as it assumes you have elementary knowledge in the advanced calculus, but you can learn the necessary concepts as you read (he also teaches you some basics like Fourier analysis). He covers basics of elementary number theory, followed by good overview of the analytic number theory (mostly multiplicative). After reading his book, you can actually jump to his two-volume set in the additive number theory, which covers Goldbach Conjecture and Waring Theorem.

Apostol is not quite gentle either but you could learn first few chapters well.
No wonder I found it hard for me to read the Hardys book even just for the first few pages .I think I will give D .Burton a try , thanks anyway !
 
i am self learning physics. have you ever worked your way backwards again after finishing most undergrad courses? i have textbooks for junior/senior physics courses in classical mechanics, electrodynamics, thermal physics, quantum mechanics, and mathematical methods for self learning. i have the Halliday Resnick sophomore book. working backwards, i checked out Conceptual Physics 11th edition by Hewitt and found this book very helpful. What i liked most was how stimulating the pictures...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K