Is it a bad idea to do quantum with Shankar without having Griffiths first?

AI Thread Summary
When choosing between a one-semester QM course with Griffiths and a two-semester course with Shankar, it's important to consider the depth of understanding desired. Griffiths is popular but not universally regarded as the best teaching method for undergraduates. Shankar, while potentially more formal, is also suitable for upper-level undergraduates and may provide a more comprehensive approach to quantum mechanics. Ultimately, opting for the two-semester course with Shankar can enhance understanding, especially for those with a strong interest in the subject.
Isaiah Gray
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
I have the option of doing either a one-semester QM course with Griffiths or a two-semester course with Shankar. Background is Eisberg and Resnick's "Quantum Physics". I really like quantum mechanics and would rather do two semesters, but will Shankar be too formal for an upper-level undergraduate?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No, both are textbooks for undergraduates.
 
Griffiths is not the unequivocally best way to teach quantum mechanics to an undergraduate. Many people would say Shankar is a better approach. Point being, it's not a bad idea.
 

Thread 'Hepth programs in Europe'

After a year of thought, I decided to adjust my ratio for applying the US/EU(+UK) schools. I mostly focused on the US schools before, but things are getting complex and I found out that Europe is also a good place to study. I found some institutes that have professors with similar interests. But gaining the information is much harder than US schools (like you have to contact professors in advance etc). For your information, I have B.S. in engineering (low GPA: 3.2/4.0) in Asia - one SCI...
View full post »

Thread 'Should I pursue a masters degree after 4.5 years working in IT?'

I graduated with a BSc in Physics in 2020. Since there were limited opportunities in my country (mostly teaching), I decided to improve my programming skills and began working in IT, first as a software engineer and later as a quality assurance engineer, where I’ve now spent about 3 years. While this career path has provided financial stability, I’ve realized that my excitement and passion aren’t really there, unlike what I felt when studying or doing research in physics. Working in IT...
View full post »

Thread 'What are the best A-Level options for someone wanting to do Physics?'

Bit Britain-specific but I was wondering, what's the best path to take for A-Levels out of the following (I know Y10 seems a bit early to be thinking about A-levels, but my choice will impact what I do this year/ in y11) I (almost) definitely want to do physics at University - so keep that in mind... The subjects that I'm almost definitely going to take are Maths, Further Maths and Physics, and I'm taking a fast track programme which means that I'll be taking AS computer science at the end...
View full post »

Similar threads

Other Is it difficult to apply for a PhD in physics without experience?
Replies
10
Views
3K
Studying Advice On Self Study Choices for Physics
Replies
1
Views
2K
Help with deciding electives: Differential Geometry or Quantum Info
Replies
5
Views
1K
Studying What Are the Best Steps for Self-Teaching Theoretical Physics?
Replies
14
Views
3K
Courses Quantum Optics, Feeling Overwhelmed and Underprepared
Replies
7
Views
2K
Courses Graduate Quantum as an Undergrad
Replies
12
Views
8K
Quantum QM Alternatives to Shankar for Undergraduate Level
Replies
5
Views
3K
Teaching myself quantum mechanics in preparation for second year
Replies
14
Views
3K
Best quantum mechanics text for reference in condensed matter theory
Replies
3
Views
2K
Studying Quantum Field Theory without taking graduate QM?
Replies
3
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top