Is it a bad idea to do quantum with Shankar without having Griffiths first?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Engaging with Shankar's "Principles of Quantum Mechanics" without prior exposure to Griffiths' "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" is not a detrimental choice for upper-level undergraduates. Both textbooks are designed for undergraduate comprehension, and many educators advocate for Shankar's approach as superior. The discussion emphasizes that students with a background in Eisberg and Resnick's "Quantum Physics" are well-prepared to tackle Shankar's material. Ultimately, opting for the two-semester course with Shankar can be a beneficial decision.

PREREQUISITES
  • Familiarity with Eisberg and Resnick's "Quantum Physics"
  • Understanding of undergraduate-level quantum mechanics concepts
  • Basic knowledge of quantum mechanics terminology and principles
  • Ability to engage with advanced mathematical formulations in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore Shankar's "Principles of Quantum Mechanics" for a deeper understanding of quantum theory
  • Review Griffiths' "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" for alternative pedagogical approaches
  • Investigate additional resources on undergraduate quantum mechanics courses
  • Participate in forums discussing the comparative effectiveness of different quantum mechanics textbooks
USEFUL FOR

Undergraduate physics students, educators in quantum mechanics, and anyone considering advanced studies in quantum theory will benefit from this discussion.

Isaiah Gray
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
I have the option of doing either a one-semester QM course with Griffiths or a two-semester course with Shankar. Background is Eisberg and Resnick's "Quantum Physics". I really like quantum mechanics and would rather do two semesters, but will Shankar be too formal for an upper-level undergraduate?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No, both are textbooks for undergraduates.
 
Griffiths is not the unequivocally best way to teach quantum mechanics to an undergraduate. Many people would say Shankar is a better approach. Point being, it's not a bad idea.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
8K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K