Is it a bad idea to do quantum with Shankar without having Griffiths first?

AI Thread Summary
When choosing between a one-semester QM course with Griffiths and a two-semester course with Shankar, it's important to consider the depth of understanding desired. Griffiths is popular but not universally regarded as the best teaching method for undergraduates. Shankar, while potentially more formal, is also suitable for upper-level undergraduates and may provide a more comprehensive approach to quantum mechanics. Ultimately, opting for the two-semester course with Shankar can enhance understanding, especially for those with a strong interest in the subject.
Isaiah Gray
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
I have the option of doing either a one-semester QM course with Griffiths or a two-semester course with Shankar. Background is Eisberg and Resnick's "Quantum Physics". I really like quantum mechanics and would rather do two semesters, but will Shankar be too formal for an upper-level undergraduate?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No, both are textbooks for undergraduates.
 
Griffiths is not the unequivocally best way to teach quantum mechanics to an undergraduate. Many people would say Shankar is a better approach. Point being, it's not a bad idea.
 

Thread 'What major topics are there in arithmetic and what order to learn them?'

TL;DR Summary: What topics to cover to safely say I know arithmetic ? I am learning arithmetic from Indian NCERT textbook. Currently I have finished addition ,substraction of 2 digit numbers and divisions, multiplication of 1 digit numbers. I am moving pretty slowly. Can someone tell me what topics to cover first to build a framework and then go on in detail. I want to learn fast. It has taken me a year now learning arithmetic. I want to speed up. Thanks for the help in advance. (I also...
View full post »

Thread 'Help with my plan to get into research about bound states'

Hi community My aim is to get into research about atoms, specifically, I want to do experimental research that explores questions like: 1. Why do Gallium/Mercury have low melting points 2. Why are there so many exceptions and inconsistencies when it comes to explaining molecular structures / reaction mechanisms in inorganic and organic chemistry 3. Experimental research about fundamental Quantum Mechanics, such as the one being followed by Hiroshima university that proved that observing...
View full post »

Thread 'What is computational physics and what is the best way or method to learn computational physics?'

guys i am currently studying in computer science engineering [1st yr]. i was intrested in physics when i was in high school. due to some circumstances i chose computer science engineering degree. so i want to incoporate computer science engineering with physics and i came across computational physics. i am intrested studying it but i dont know where to start. can you guys reccomend me some yt channels or some free courses or some other way to learn the computational physics.
View full post »

Similar threads

Other Is it difficult to apply for a PhD in physics without experience?
Replies
10
Views
3K
Studying Advice On Self Study Choices for Physics
Replies
1
Views
2K
Help with deciding electives: Differential Geometry or Quantum Info
Replies
5
Views
1K
Studying What Are the Best Steps for Self-Teaching Theoretical Physics?
Replies
14
Views
3K
Courses Quantum Optics, Feeling Overwhelmed and Underprepared
Replies
7
Views
2K
Courses Graduate Quantum as an Undergrad
Replies
12
Views
8K
Quantum QM Alternatives to Shankar for Undergraduate Level
Replies
5
Views
3K
Teaching myself quantum mechanics in preparation for second year
Replies
14
Views
3K
Best quantum mechanics text for reference in condensed matter theory
Replies
3
Views
2K
Studying Quantum Field Theory without taking graduate QM?
Replies
3
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top