- #1

- 61

- 5

---Is this okay as a physics major, or should I make certain I know these relationships?---

- Courses
- Thread starter astroman707
- Start date

- #1

- 61

- 5

---Is this okay as a physics major, or should I make certain I know these relationships?---

- #2

- 9,386

- 2,739

- #3

- 1,795

- 914

I think it is OK that you don't understand it the first time you see it, but this late in the semester you should have worked at figuring it out -- you should understand it by now. It seems there are always people in class who "get it" effortlessly. The rest of us have to work to "get it."I don't understand a good portion of the non-algebraic math behind much of the physics in my first semester college class.

- #4

- 16,829

- 6,643

- #5

- 61

- 5

Does anyone have any suggestions on a good method to learn the more advanced mathematical relationships in physics?

@Orodruin, your advice would be greatly appreciated.

- #6

- 16,829

- 6,643

- #7

Wrichik Basu

Gold Member

- 1,490

- 1,343

I faced a similar difficulty when I started out with quantum mechanics in high school. Much of the linear algebra required there was not known to me. But the professor whose course I was attending, briefed out the basics, and I was good to go with that.Does anyone have any suggestions on a good method to learn the more advanced mathematical relationships in physics?

However, the advice of another professor has been very useful for me. He had told me that when I cannot follow a certain topic in physics or chemistry due to maths, then I should pause there, refer to some book and learn the basics, and return to the course.

Actually, I find it difficult to continuously follow a course strictly on maths. That's mainly because I do not like rigorous maths too much. Moreover, it is often not possible to follow books with titles "Mathematical Methods for Physicists" because I don't know much of the advanced physics stuff that the author uses using as examples (Note: I am not talking about @Orodruin's book). However, referring to such books in the middle of a course in physics has proved to be helpful.

Generally when I get stuck in a course on some topic, I refer to an introductory book on that topic, which generally outlines the basic maths in the first one or two chapters. For example, when I was stuck in tensors, I took up Dirac's book on General Theory of Relativity (because I knew that GR requires tensors). The first two or three chapters were good enough for me to head back to the original course. Similarly, Griffiths' book on QM lists most of the required linear algebra in the third chapter.

- #8

- 5,672

- 941

I felt I got a sense of what was to become important, even if I didn't understand much of it at the time.

Certainly, I would still try to learn the current material... but I felt I had a sense of where this is all going.

I would also look at alternate textbooks... to get a different viewpoint... and maybe I'll like that text better. Shop around!

I feel that many students don't consider texts outside the official course textbook.

- #9

FactChecker

Science Advisor

Gold Member

- 5,749

- 2,135

It sounds like you have skipped the math prerequisites (or corequisites). You should not do that.I don't understand a good portion of the non-algebraic math behind much of the physics in my first semester college class. I understand everything with algebra, and can solve all problems, but I don't understand the relationships with vector cross/dot products, calculus derivations, DE, etc.

- #10

- 95

- 5

You don't understand the meaning behind dot product and cross product till you reach calculus 3. I was very lucky to have taken calculus 1-3 before I took Physics 1.It sounds like you have skipped the math prerequisites (or corequisites). You should not do that.

- #11

- 5,672

- 941

Dot and Cross, being algebraic operations, can be understood without calc 3. However, calculus topics like divergence and curl or line- and surface-integrals probably need calc 3.You don't understand the meaning behind dot product and cross product till you reach calculus 3. I was very lucky to have taken calculus 1-3 before I took Physics 1.

- #12

FactChecker

Science Advisor

Gold Member

- 5,749

- 2,135

I don't remember when I first encountered vectors and simple vector algebra. I would think that a brief introduction could easily be done before or as part of Physics 1.You don't understand the meaning behind dot product and cross product till you reach calculus 3. I was very lucky to have taken calculus 1-3 before I took Physics 1.

- #13

- 95

- 5

You don't go into depth, but you do learn vectors in Algebra-based physics. Is like the second chapterI don't remember when I first encountered vectors and simple vector algebra. I would think that a brief introduction could easily be done before or as part of Physics 1.

- Replies
- 6

- Views
- 1K

- Replies
- 12

- Views
- 4K

- Replies
- 32

- Views
- 126K

- Last Post

- Replies
- 13

- Views
- 33K

- Replies
- 14

- Views
- 9K

- Replies
- 4

- Views
- 1K

- Replies
- 4

- Views
- 1K

- Last Post

- Replies
- 2

- Views
- 3K

- Replies
- 2

- Views
- 5K

- Last Post

- Replies
- 7

- Views
- 3K