Is it possible to approximate an equation with circulant and toeplitz matrices?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter EngWiPy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Matrices
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the approximation of an equation involving N-by-N circulant and Toeplitz matrices, specifically the equation \|\mathbf{H}_3\mathbf{H}_1\mathbf{e}\|^2=\mathbf{e}^{H}\mathbf{H}_1^{H}\mathbf{H}_3^{H}\mathbf{H}_3\mathbf{H}_1\mathbf{e}. The authors claim that this can be approximated as \|\mathbf{H}_3\|^2\|\mathbf{H}_1\mathbf{e}\|^2, with a mean square error that is tolerable in simulations. The discussion highlights the necessity of specifying the matrix norm used, which is identified as the Frobenius norm, and questions the generality of the approximation based on properties of circulant matrices.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of circulant and Toeplitz matrices
  • Familiarity with matrix norms, specifically the Frobenius norm
  • Knowledge of the Schwarz inequality in linear algebra
  • Basic concepts of mean square error in simulations
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the properties of circulant and Toeplitz matrices in detail
  • Study the Frobenius norm and its applications in matrix approximations
  • Explore the implications of the Schwarz inequality in matrix theory
  • Investigate methods for analyzing mean square error in mathematical simulations
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, data scientists, and engineers working with matrix approximations, particularly those involved in signal processing or numerical analysis.

EngWiPy
Messages
1,361
Reaction score
61
Hi all,

I am reading a paper which contains a lot of matrices. Anyway, there is this equation:

\|\mathbf{H}_3\mathbf{H}_1\mathbf{e}\|^2=\mathbf{e}^{H}\mathbf{H}_1^{H}\mathbf{H}_3^{H}\mathbf{H}_3\mathbf{H}_1\mathbf{e}

where superscript H means conjugate transpose, and boldface Hs are N-by-N circulant and toeplitz matrices, where the first column is defined as:

\begin{array}{ccccccc}h_i(0)&h_i(1)&\cdots &h_i(L)&\mathbf{0}_{1\times N-L-1}\end{array}

and e is some N-by-1 vector. It is claimed that the above equation can be approximated as:

\|\mathbf{H}_3\|^2\|\mathbf{H}_1\mathbf{e}\|^2

but the authors did not say how and why? They just claimed that in simulation the mean square error between both of them is tolerable and small. Further it is said that:

\|\mathbf{H}_3\|^2=N\sum_{m=0}^L|h_3(m)|^2

are all of that justifiable? and how?

Thanks in advance
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Evaluate the first claim in terms of the Schwarz inequality
||AB||\leq||A||\cdot ||B||
The claim that equality is a good approximation must be specific to this system and the actual quantities involved. (This is further suggested by your quote that they found it to be true in simulation.) I don't see why it would follow generally from properties of circulant matrices.

You don't state the particular matrix norm used in the 2nd claim. If it is the Frobenius norm
||A||_F^2=\sum_{i,j}|a_{i,j}|^2
then your equation follows immediately since all components of a Toeplitz matrix are found in the first column, repeated N times.
 
I forgot to include a factor of 1/N in the approximation, and yes, the norm is Frobenius.
 
Is there any identity such that:

\|\mathbf{A}\mathbf{B}\|^2_F\geq x
 
I'm not aware of one, but someone more knowledgeable in math might know.
 
marcusl said:
I'm not aware of one, but someone more knowledgeable in math might know.

Ok, thanks anyway.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
562
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 71 ·
3
Replies
71
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 59 ·
2
Replies
59
Views
7K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
3K