Is it possible to boil water by stirring it?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Boiling water by stirring is theoretically possible, as demonstrated by the Joule experiment, which shows that work can increase the temperature of a liquid. However, in practical scenarios, significant energy loss occurs through heat transfer to the environment, making it improbable to achieve boiling without a specialized setup, such as a vacuum chamber or a high-efficiency centrifugal pump. Real-world examples indicate that while stirring can raise water temperature, the energy required is substantial, often exceeding practical limits. The discussion highlights that centrifugal pumps can create steam under specific conditions, illustrating the complexities involved in this phenomenon.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Joule experiment and thermodynamics
  • Knowledge of centrifugal pump operation and efficiency
  • Familiarity with heat transfer principles
  • Basic concepts of energy calculations in physical systems
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the principles of thermodynamics and the Joule experiment in detail
  • Explore the mechanics of centrifugal pumps and their applications in industrial processes
  • Learn about heat transfer mechanisms and their impact on energy efficiency
  • Investigate practical experiments for heating liquids using mechanical work
USEFUL FOR

Engineers, physicists, and anyone interested in thermodynamics, mechanical engineering, or industrial processes involving heat transfer and fluid dynamics will benefit from this discussion.

Thalita Luna
Messages
4
Reaction score
1
According to the Joule experiment, work can increase the temperature of a liquid. Is it possible to boil water simply by stirring it? How much energy would be required?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: OmCheeto
Science news on Phys.org
Theoretically, yes. But in reality you'd lose enough energy through heat transfer to the environment that it would probably never boil without a very, very specific setup.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: OmCheeto and russ_watters
Drakkith said:
Theoretically, yes. But in reality you'd lose enough energy through heat transfer to the environment that it would probably never boil without a very, very specific setup.
Practically, too, by cavitation.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: sophiecentaur, AndreasC, Dale and 1 other person
Thalita Luna said:
According to the Joule experiment, work can increase the temperature of a liquid. Is it possible to boil water simply by stirring it? How much energy would be required?
Why not do an experiment with a bucket of water, a stirrer and a thermometer?
 
Thalita Luna said:
Is it possible to boil water simply by stirring it? How much energy would be required?
It might depend on the starting temperature of the water. Can you say why? :smile:
 
  • Haha
Likes   Reactions: DaveC426913
berkeman said:
It might depend on the starting temperature of the water. Can you say why? :smile:
And atmospheric pressure. It depends on the entire setup of the experiment. @PeroK's bucket is probably doomed to fail, but if you have a vacuum chamber or a submarine, or a small volume with a really fast stirrer ...
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: sophiecentaur and DaveC426913
Thalita Luna said:
Is it possible to boil water simply by stirring it?
YES.
It happens in centrifugal pumps when you fail to open the outlet valve. The water that remains in the pump does not carry the "inefficiency heat" away, so it increases in temperature, until it boils. The lower steam density then reduces the centrifugal pressure, and the motor power consumption. The pump maintains the steam and boiling water, until the outlet valve is opened.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: Rive, sophiecentaur, jrmichler and 4 others
Thalita Luna said:
According to the Joule experiment, work can increase the temperature of a liquid. Is it possible to boil water simply by stirring it? How much energy would be required?
You should try doing some calculations for yourself…. make some sensible assumptions about how much power is going into turning the paddles and how much heat escapes from the water…. @Baluncore has given you an example of an extreme case.
 
  • #10
PeroK said:
I associated a setup with a real bucket and a painter's stirrer by your description, something like that:

abtoenfarbe-mischen-1200x800.jpg
 
  • #11
Baluncore said:
YES.
It happens in centrifugal pumps when you fail to open the outlet valve. The water that remains in the pump does not carry the "inefficiency heat" away, so it increases in temperature, until it boils. The lower steam density then reduces the centrifugal pressure, and the motor power consumption. The pump maintains the steam and boiling water, until the outlet valve is opened.
Huh. I wouldn't have thought it would be practical. Looks like I was wrong.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: phinds
  • #12
Drakkith said:
Huh. I wouldn't have thought it would be practical. Looks like I was wrong.
It is so simple a mistake, that you are unlikely to meet anyone prepared to admit that they have done it. We learn by other's mistakes. The others remain anonymous, but go by the nickname "tea's up".
 
  • #13
Drakkith said:
Huh. I wouldn't have thought it would be practical. Looks like I was wrong.
what he said (very small).jpg
 
  • #14
Drakkith said:
I wouldn't have thought it would be practical.
Well. it kind of isn't. The effect is nonzero, but remember that the latent heat of vaporization is 540 cal/g - if it weren't for the phase transition, you'd need to heat your water to 640 C )almost 1200 F). It takes a huge amount of energy to boil water.

If you want steam, there are better ways to get it.
 
  • #16
Sure, It can be done. I've done it myself. I've done it myself when it was an undesired side effect, in fact. But there's a reason that most people who want steam buy a boiler and not a giant spoon.
 
  • #17
Vanadium 50 said:
Sure, It can be done. I've done it myself. I've done it myself when it was an undesired side effect, in fact. But there's a reason that most people who want steam buy a boiler and not a giant spoon.
-My arm is tired!

-Shut up and continue stirring. I want to brew my coffee!
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes   Reactions: jtbell, fresh_42, Vanadium 50 and 1 other person
  • #18
DrClaude said:
I want to brew my coffee!
Maxwell's Demon House?
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes   Reactions: Tom.G, hutchphd, jtbell and 2 others
  • #19
The OP doesn't say anything about practicality...

Also, more broadly, this issue is very significant for some industrial processes, like food processing. I once did some work at a cocoa bean processing facility where the beans were chopped up by giant blenders into a viscous mixture of cocoa powder saturated with cocoa butter. If I remember correctly the motors were 100 kW and the blender vessels had chilled water jackets to remove that 100 kW of heat so as not to cook/burn the products. The process heat kept the products liquid at 95F or so, and the room was heavily insulated and cooled year-round to 95F to keep the products flowing from process to process at the right temperature.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PeroK
  • #21
DrClaude said:
-My arm is tired!

-Shut up and continue stirring. I want to brew my coffee!
I analyzed the video from PeroK's post #9 and determined that the effective power input to the water from the blender was about 530 watts. I then googled and discovered that top athletes arms have a maximum continuous output of 30 watts. I decided that Drakkith was correct stating that it was theoretically possible but practically improbable. Can you imagine 18 Arnold Schwarzenegger sized arms trying to stir up 16 ounces of water? That would be quite the contraption to do something like that. I suppose we could give each of them one ounce containers with arm powered blenders specifically designed for the task.

Another interesting thing was that his blender heated the water about as fast as my microwave. It takes my microwave 7 minutes to bring 16 ounces of tap water to a rolling boil. In the video, the amount of water varied from between 18 to 14 ounces, so I took the average.

Action Lab boiling water with blender Screenshot 2023-11-17 at 08.03.44.png


Much eyeballing was utilized in the creation of the graph.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PeroK and Drakkith
  • #22
OmCheeto said:
Another interesting thing was that his blender heated the water about as fast as my microwave. It takes my microwave 7 minutes to bring 16 ounces of tap water to a rolling boil.
7 minutes? You know you're supposed to keep the door closed, right?
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes   Reactions: vela, fresh_42 and berkeman
  • #23
As another real-world example, when it is time to bring a nuclear reactor from cold to operating conditions (550F, 2250 psia), we run the reactor coolant pumps (first one, then two, eventually four). Even with unburned fuel (no decay heat), this "stirring" works pretty quickly (half a day maybe). The pumps are about 2 MW (or 67,000 Arnolds for you non-metric types).
 
  • Haha
Likes   Reactions: hutchphd and russ_watters
  • #24
OmCheeto said:
I analyzed the video from PeroK's post #9 and determined that the effective power input to the water from the blender was about 530 watts. I then googled and discovered that top athletes arms have a maximum continuous output of 30 watts.
Legs would be more effective, via a stationary bicycle or a Peloton or similar device. A fit recreational bicycle tourist like I used to be can probably put out 75-100 W for hours. A Google search seems to indicate that a highly fit racer can do 400 W in a sprint.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: russ_watters
  • #25
jtbell said:
Legs would be more effective, via a stationary bicycle or a Peloton or similar device. A fit recreational bicycle tourist like I used to be can probably put out 75-100 W for hours. A Google search seems to indicate that a highly fit racer can do 400 W in a sprint.
Up to 600W for 30 seconds in the lead in team time trials.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman
  • #26
Stationary bike? I wonder if you evaporate more water by sweating or stirring.
 
  • #28
PF spouses are the most understanding people on the planet.
 
  • #29
jtbell said:
Legs would be more effective, via a stationary bicycle or a Peloton or similar device. A fit recreational bicycle tourist like I used to be can probably put out 75-100 W for hours. A Google search seems to indicate that a highly fit racer can do 400 W in a sprint.
And it's actually a thing:

https://wheelygoodsmoothies.com/
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Drakkith and jtbell
  • #30
I wonder how much the heat from the motor and shaft friction added? Probably it doesn't change the result, just the amount of time.

I would have guessed you couldn't do it. But now having seen it I don't know why I thought that. Provided heat loss isn't too great it seems like you could keep adding heat endlessly. With the right liquid perhaps in addition to destroying his thermometer probe he could have melted down his blender as well.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: sophiecentaur and PeroK

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K