Undergrad Is it possible to calculate Tsupercon from the unit cell?

Click For Summary
Calculating the superconducting transition temperature (Tc) from a unit cell is feasible for conventional superconductors using BCS theory, but requires advanced computer simulations rather than analytical methods. High-temperature superconductors present a challenge as the underlying mechanisms are not fully understood, preventing reliable predictions of Tc based solely on unit cell structure. While some insights exist, such as the role of CuO2 in cuprates, no comprehensive model currently predicts Tc for these materials. The discussion highlights the ongoing research and potential for discovering new superconducting compounds. Understanding these complexities remains a significant area of interest in superconductivity research.
jonjacson
Messages
450
Reaction score
38
Hi folks,

It is an elementary question for people expert in superconductivity.

I know there is a theory, the BCS theory, and the GIzburg Landau theory too that apparently explains superconductivity.

My question is, if I give you a unit cell would you be able to tell me the temperature at which that solid enters into the superconducting state?

And the same question for high temperature superconductors, Is there a theory that tells you the Tc if the unit cell is known?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For BCS (conventional) superconductor it is possible to calculate Tc if you know the structure (which we nearly always do, we are very, very good at determining crystal structures). However, you need advanced computer simulations to do so, it can't be done analytically.

High temperature superconductor are very different. We do not even fully understand why these materials are superconducting, meaning there are no models that can be used to predict Tc.
 
  • Like
Likes jonjacson
f95toli said:
For BCS (conventional) superconductor it is possible to calculate Tc if you know the structure (which we nearly always do, we are very, very good at determining crystal structures). However, you need advanced computer simulations to do so, it can't be done analytically.

High temperature superconductor are very different. We do not even fully understand why these materials are superconducting, meaning there are no models that can be used to predict Tc.

Thanks!

So scientists are able to synthesize them but without the underlying theory, interesting.
 
jonjacson said:
Thanks!

So scientists are able to synthesize them but without the underlying theory, interesting.

We do have SOME ideas about what makes them superconducting (e.g. the role of the CuO2 in the cuprates) so it is not like the chemists are just combining elements at random, if you look at the structure of say the cuprates you will find that they have a similar structure so that is a clue.

But yes, it is very possible that there are many more superconducting compounds out there that we don't know of (see the fairly recent discovery of the pnictides)
 
  • Like
Likes jonjacson
Look into:
The Eliashberg-Migdal formalism (basically extended BCS theory), and also
Dynamical Mean Field Theory (Kotliar) which has successfully predicted a superconductor (if I recall correctly, it was high-temperature).

It's complicated stuff!
 
  • Like
Likes jonjacson
Thanks!

I will have a look.

I know, but it is very interesting.
 
Thread 'Unexpected irregular reflection signal from a high-finesse cavity'
I am observing an irregular, aperiodic noise pattern in the reflection signal of a high-finesse optical cavity (finesse ≈ 20,000). The cavity is normally operated using a standard Pound–Drever–Hall (PDH) locking configuration, where an EOM provides phase modulation. The signals shown in the attached figures were recorded with the modulation turned off. Under these conditions, when scanning the laser frequency across a cavity resonance, I expected to observe a simple reflection dip. Instead...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
8K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
11K