Is It Possible to Chase Yourself Around the World?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Godswitch
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Impossible
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the hypothetical scenario of a person attempting to chase themselves around the world while accelerating. Participants explore the implications of light travel, the Arrow Paradox, and the nature of seeing one's own image as they move. The conversation touches on theoretical physics concepts, including relativity and the behavior of light.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that if a person accelerates around the planet, they would not see themselves unless using a mirror, as light travels in straight lines and does not curve around the Earth.
  • Others argue that even if the person were to travel at near-light speed, they would not catch up to their own image, which would be moving away from them at the speed of light.
  • A participant introduces the Arrow Paradox to illustrate the complexities of motion and perception, questioning whether one could see a laser beam before it hits a card, suggesting a scenario where light moves at a much slower speed.
  • Some participants challenge the relevance of the Arrow Paradox and the assumptions made about light speed, emphasizing that special relativity dictates that no object can exceed the speed of light.
  • Another participant raises a scenario involving a bow and arrow to question the implications of time travel and whether one could interact with their past self.
  • There is a discussion about the nature of light and perception, with some participants expressing confusion over the relationship between the speed of light and the scenarios presented.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally do not reach a consensus, as multiple competing views remain regarding the implications of light travel, the Arrow Paradox, and the hypothetical scenario of chasing oneself. Disagreements persist about the interpretations of light behavior and the relevance of the examples used.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include assumptions about the speed of light, the nature of perception, and the implications of special relativity. The discussion does not resolve the mathematical or conceptual challenges posed by the scenarios.

Godswitch
Messages
34
Reaction score
0
Chasing The Impossible

Lets assume all the elements are in place

If a person was to start from any point on the planet and accelerate and maintain his/her acceleration and continue accelerating, having traveled once round the planet, to the point of origin, is it possible the person could see him/herself self starting.

 
Physics news on Phys.org
No, unless he was looking in a mirror.

Let's just say that he accelerated so fast that he was instantly traveling at almost the speed of light. Then if we considered the image of him starting off to be traveling around the planet in the other direction, he would arrive on the other side of the planet at approximately the same time that his image would, correct? But let's say another person is already standing on the other side of the planet. Do people on the other side of the planet see what is happening on this side of the planet? Not on planet earth. Why is that? Well for several reasons, not the least of which is that light doesn't normally travel in curves, it goes in straight lines, unless refracted by some medium. Although there is some refraction of light in our atmosphere, it is no where near enough to cause an image on one side of the Earth to travel all the way around to the other side. Otherwise, it would never get dark at night, correct? So the image of this person starting off, if it survived anywhere would be going out into space, more or less directly behind him. So if he had any hope of seeing himself starting off by going around the planet, he would have to launch himself into space shortly after getting half way around to chase his image which already got a massive head start. But since his image is traveling at the speed of light and he is already so far behind it, he will never be able to catch up to it.

Your question could be phrased in a different manner to point out something very important about light. Once light leaves you, you can never, ever see it again, and you can have no direct knowledge of its presence or location, unless you put a mirror some distance away from you and reflect that light back to you. That is the only way you can ever see the light that starts from your location.
 
The idea of "Chasing The Impossible" is very much like the Arrow Paradox...

With the Arrow Paradox, the arrow is always fired.

You would think it is possible to catch up with oneself and even talk briefly

Lets say for arguments sake light only moves at 1 mph and you place a laser at one end of a darkened room and point the laser at the opposite side of the room some 400 metres away. You position yourself at a point some 275 metres and hold a piece of black card in the line of the lasers travel...

The question is, Even though the light is "ON" would you see the laser before its hits the card

Im completely divided at this point:

In this instance the light is "ON" but you do not see it until it has reached you and theoretically you could move at 10 mph away from the Laser and it would appear to be "OFF"
 
You've just imagined that you can travel faster than the speed of light and I don't understand why you bring up the Arrow Paradox and I don't understand why you want to image light going 1 mph or how that relates to your scenario or why the room has to be 400 meters.

But I think the answer to your question is no, you will not see the laser turning on until the light from the laser travels to the card, bounces off it, is dispersed and finally some of it ends up in your eye.

But since you asked the question, you must have some different idea of how light travels. Maybe you should explain what your concepts are in detail if you want help to get straightened out.
 
Last edited:
ghwellsjr said:
But I think the answer to your question is no, you will not see the laser turning on until the light from the laser travels to the card, bounces off it, is dispersed and finally some of it ends up in your eye.

Wrong because the light has to be on before any light can strike the card. You said you would not see the light turning on...a slight misinterpretation perhaps but an important one!
 
Godswitch said:
The idea of "Chasing The Impossible" is very much like the Arrow Paradox...

With the Arrow Paradox, the arrow is always fired.

You would think it is possible to catch up with oneself and even talk briefly

Lets say for arguments sake light only moves at 1 mph and you place a laser at one end of a darkened room and point the laser at the opposite side of the room some 400 metres away. You position yourself at a point some 275 metres and hold a piece of black card in the line of the lasers travel...

The question is, Even though the light is "ON" would you see the laser before its hits the card

Im completely divided at this point:

In this instance the light is "ON" but you do not see it until it has reached you and theoretically you could move at 10 mph away from the Laser and it would appear to be "OFF"

If, in your example, you want to choose to have light move at 1 mph, then in your example, you wouldn't be able to move at 10 mph. The special theory of relativity doesn't really care what the speed of light is, it simply states that no material object can reach or move faster than the speed of light. It turns out that the speed of light is 186,000 miles per second, but the postulates of the special theory would still hold true if the speed of light was a different number.
 
I realize that piece of theory, hence the need for the Arrow Paradox - Otherwise if all arrows were to travel far and fast enough without entering orbit we'd all be shooting ourselves in the back...
 
I don't really know what the arrow paradox has to do with the example that you gave. In your example, light moves at 1 mph and you move at 10 mph. That violates special relativity.
 
Fair enough...
 
  • #10
Lets just say...Once again

Lets assume all the elements are in place

If a person was to start from any point on the planet and accelerate and maintain his/her acceleration and continue accelerating, having traveled once round the planet, to the point of origin, is it possible the person could see him/herself self starting/leaving.

Lets just say you had a bow and arrow or a knife and you reach the point of origin you either fire an arrow at you starting/leaving or stab would this arrow or knife hit your back!

Because if this is not possible it proves that a traveller moving back in time is not connected to the future and any interaction by the traveller in the past will have no effect on the traveller as he cannot exist in two places.
 
  • #11
I suppose if you didn't like my first answers to you, you're not going to like anything I would say now. Obviously, you have a unique thought process. I doubt that anyone else can figure out what you are talking about.

l'm tempted to repeat the second paragraph from my first respose to you, but since it had no impact the first time, I doubt it would have any impact this time.

Are you thinking that the original image of the person starting out stays in the same location so that when the person goes around the planet and returns back, he will see his image that never moved?
 
  • #12
Ok..OK I understand what you are saying and It looks like we have arrived at a brick wall and that brick wall is the speed of light.

I'll brush up on some theories so next time we can have a better conversation"some things don't have to make sense to make sense"
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
6K
  • · Replies 330 ·
12
Replies
330
Views
33K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
4K