Is it possible to identify something with sound?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Nerdydude101
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Sound
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the possibility of identifying substances using sound, exploring both theoretical and practical applications. Participants consider various methods, including echolocation and sonar, and compare these to techniques involving light, such as Raman spectroscopy.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that sound can be used to identify objects, referencing how bats and dolphins utilize echolocation.
  • One participant suggests that while sound can indicate the presence of an object, identifying specific substances, like dirt in water, may require more sophisticated methods.
  • Another participant mentions that sonar technology can differentiate between various objects in water based on their acoustic responses, but identifying impurities may require advanced equipment.
  • A participant raises the idea of using natural frequencies of substances to enhance identification through resonance, although they acknowledge the practical challenges involved.
  • Some participants discuss the use of light for identification, specifically mentioning Raman spectroscopy as a method for determining molecular composition through light scattering.
  • One participant shares their experience with a system designed to sort metals using ultrasound, indicating that different materials have varying acoustic impedances.
  • There is a mention of line spectrum in relation to the original question, suggesting a potential connection to the discussion on sound identification.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the effectiveness of sound for identifying specific substances, with some supporting its potential and others highlighting limitations. The discussion on light identification methods introduces additional complexity, indicating that multiple competing views remain unresolved.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the need for sensitive equipment to distinguish between different impurities in a medium and the practical difficulties of utilizing natural frequencies for small particles. The discussion also reflects varying levels of familiarity with the mathematical and technical aspects of sound and light identification methods.

Nerdydude101
Messages
54
Reaction score
0
Is it to identify something (not necessarily very accurately but at all) with sound? Also, i know its possible with light but i don't exactly understand how, can someone explain?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Identify something with sound? You mean... hear something with your ears?
 
No, more like using the souls spectrum (if that's the proper word for it) to identify something like a substance, say stuff in the blood or dirt in a glass if water you can't see, etc, not hearing
 
Of course you can. Bats and dolphins do it all the time! I won't go all national geographic on you though cause frankly, I'd suck at that.

If you closed your eyes and yelled into a cave as opposed to an open field or concert hall, you'd be able to identify the general structure of the space just from the echo you get back (or in the case of the open field, no echo at all). Our ears aren't so incredible that we can discern very much, but a device built to pick up the echo certainly could. Every time sound bounces, it'll lose a little bit of energy (and therefore frequency, so the pitch would drop a bit), and by knowing where the sound wave came from and comparing to waves from all sides, you'd be able to compute where solid objects are.

Hope I answered the right question.
 
What about identifying what a substance is? Like going back to my dirt in the cup example, can we identify that t is dirt using sound? Or can we only tell that something is there?
 
The more specific you get, the more refined your method needs to be. Simply yelling at a cup...probably won't work in that case, but equipment has already been built for the job. For example, sonar uses sound waves to identify objects in water. It doesn't get confused between the ocean floor, a whale, or a ship. Depending on the structure of the object, the response will be slightly different. You'll need something quite sensitive to figure out the difference between the different kinds of impurities in water though. However, at that point, the budget might rise above what you'd normally spend for a casual experiment. You're better off taking it to a chemistry lab and using the gazillion techniques they have for determining purity.
 
What about light? I know we use the light spectrum to identify things and it's decently acurate, how does that work exactly? Supposedly there is some advanced math involved?
 
Or could we find the natural frequency of the dirt and match it to increase the amplitude and then measure the amplitude increase to determine the amount of dirt
 
Light, I'm much more familiar with; I'm doing a lot of MRI work right now which utilizes that to an extent.
The math... does tend to be fairly complex, but the basics can be..well...basic. Think of a single ray of light. You hit it at something and it bounces. Your detector picks it up and tells you what angle it came at. Some simple geometry and you now know the angle the surface forms to produce the deflection you observed. Do the same with many rays of light and you have a coherent view of the object. Our eyes do this all the time (though only superman actually shoots the light beams). Light scattering would be a very good way of fulfilling your requirements. Any small particle can be used actually, though light may be easiest to think about.

I'm reluctant to respond to that second part. Yes, everything has a natural frequency it oscillates at, but that property is difficult to make use of in small particles like that. Resonance is explained through circuit theory, for the most part, and requires two particular typical elements: an inductor and capacitor. All things contain traits of these parts, but not necessarily to a noticeable extent. I can't say for sure, but what you say is theoretically possible, but practically very very very difficult.
 
  • #10
Nerdydude101 said:
What about identifying what a substance is? Like going back to my dirt in the cup example, can we identify that t is dirt using sound? Or can we only tell that something is there?


I designed a system to sort scrap metal with ultrasound - makes use of the differing acoustic impedance of different metals. The tests we conducted showed that it was feasible, but it was shelved in favor of other techniques.
 
  • #11
Nerdydude101 said:
Also, i know its possible with light but i don't exactly understand how, can someone explain?

Raman spectroscopy can identify molecular composition; you shine a laser on the substance, and collect the back-scattered light ... filter out the laser line, and examine the remaining spectrum. This can be matched to a library of spectra of interest.

Raman spectroscopy: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Raman_spectroscopy

We used this in the lab to test carbon nanotube structure; it is sensitive to more than just the molecular composition, but also (sometimes) the physical properties as well.
 
  • #12
I think the OPer is talking about line spectrum.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
6K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
6K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
9K