Is it possible to learn from books?

  • Thread starter Thread starter jostpuur
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Books
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the effectiveness of learning from books, particularly in the fields of mathematics and physics. Participants share their experiences and perspectives on the challenges and benefits of book learning compared to other methods, such as courses and interactive feedback.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Exploratory
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express frustration with learning from books, noting that they often understand the material better after receiving instruction elsewhere.
  • Others emphasize the importance of feedback in the learning process, suggesting that books are more effective when combined with interactive learning environments.
  • One participant claims that it is impossible to learn anything from a book, while others challenge this assertion, stating that learning from books is possible with discipline.
  • Concerns are raised about the presence of errors in textbooks and the reliability of information compared to online resources.
  • Some participants discuss the layout and presentation of information in books as critical factors in understanding the material.
  • There are mentions of specific books, such as "Asya," which have been criticized for containing mistakes, highlighting regional differences in educational materials.
  • Several participants share strategies for effective learning from books, such as doing exercises and taking notes.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally disagree on the effectiveness of learning from books, with some asserting it is impossible while others argue it is achievable with the right approach. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the overall efficacy of book learning.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the presence of errors in textbooks can complicate learning, and there is a recognition that the effectiveness of books may depend on individual learning styles and the quality of the material.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to students, educators, and anyone exploring different methods of learning in STEM fields, particularly those considering the role of textbooks in their education.

jostpuur
Messages
2,112
Reaction score
19
I've come to notice, that when it comes to learning new things (I'm talking about mathematics and physics), either of the following two things happen with books:

1. I try to learn from the book, and get frustrated, because I don't understand it.

2. I learn the things somewhere else, for example on some course by going to exercise sessions, and after learning it, I read the book and happily see that things that I already know are being mentioned there.

*snif* :frown:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
yes but it's more difficult to learn from any medium where you have no feedback, thus physics forums. Thus lecturers, thus education.

I have spent the last 3 years learning from books, and I can honestly say without some sort of feedback both from people I worked with and this forum, it would have been much harder to learn the material, particularly because I'd had a gap between when I dropped out of college( pre University education, UK) and when I started to study again, so I was essentially coming in with a real deficit.

Books are a very good learning tool, but they really are better with continuous feed back. I had a tutor I could ask questions of, but this was limited by being remote from the person in question.
 
jostpuur said:
I've come to notice, that when it comes to learning new things (I'm talking about mathematics and physics), either of the following two things happen with books:

1. I try to learn from the book, and get frustrated, because I don't understand it.

2. I learn the things somewhere else, for example on some course by going to exercise sessions, and after learning it, I read the book and happily see that things that I already know are being mentioned there.

*snif* :frown:

I can learn from books only when I do all exercises.
 
That's practically all I do. I expect the professor to elaborate or help out, but I spend most of my studying time in front of my book, going over examples, etc.
 
Book learning is definitely hard. It will generally take you several reads to fully understand something, assuming the text provides you with enough information. Just keep at it: I find if I stare at something long enough it starts to magically make sense.
 
It is absolutely impossible for anyone to ever learn anything from a book. Anybody who tells you they have is lying.
 
Some books have minor or even major mistakes... It is better to use internet, ^__^.. Well, sometimes, books are hard to understand because the author made the topic more broad. haha
 
Ephratah7 said:
Some books have minor or even major mistakes... It is better to use internet, ^__^.. Well, sometimes, books are hard to understand because the author made the topic more broad. haha

A book has to be reviewed and edited before being published, the internet does not.

One can learn from a book but understanding what you're reading is in the doing. I find it useful to have some scrap paper when I'm reading so any point in the text where it says x was derived from y and z, I like to do on the scrap paper. I also like to do all the exercises if possible and I have folders full of completed exercises from textbooks. Just these small things make a huge difference. You don't really learn much from reading alone.
 
Kurdt said:
A book has to be reviewed and edited before being published, the internet does not.

One can learn from a book but the act of understanding what you're reading is in the doing. I find it useful to have some scrap paper when I'm reading so any point in the text where it says x was derived from y and z, I like to do on the scrap paper. I also like to do all the exercises if possible and I have folders full of completed exercises from textbooks. Just these small things make a huge difference. You don't really learn much from reading alone.

Well, yes, true. But I'm telling the truth. Some of my books have minor mistakes... sometimes, major..
 
  • #10
Ephratah7 said:
Well, yes, true. But I'm telling the truth. Some of my books have minor mistakes... sometimes, major..

I wasn't denying they didn't have mistakes. I have spotted many in my time and along with the completed exercises the folders contain lists of errors in the texts. I was just pointing out that if books undergo these rigorous checks and still have mistakes then imagine what kind of mistakes the unregulated internet has.
 
  • #11
Kurdt said:
I wasn't denying they didn't have mistakes. I have spotted many in my time and along with the completed exercises the folders contain lists of errors in the texts. I was just pointing out that if books undergo these rigorous checks and still have mistakes then imagine what kind of mistakes the unregulated internet has.

Well, it depends who made the book, ... It's ok if you won't believe me. Since you're not from Philippines, I guess you haven't heard about a book which contains major mistakes and lots of parents and teachers are complaining.
 
  • #12
billiards said:
It is absolutely impossible for anyone to ever learn anything from a book. Anybody who tells you they have is lying.

I find this an amazing statement :bugeye:
 
  • #13
Interesting. I have another take.

When learning things, a person has to have the place-holders in their mind, and let the brain, manage the space. No expectations, mean the prepared set, will be the same as before, and as space becomes limited, confusion steps in as data is excluded. Expect to double your work or stay at home.

The need to keep track of more variables at one time, grows with the increase in knowledge due to higher and higher education. Piaget notes the way children's brains expand at certain growth stages and how the knowledge retains itz character. For our purposes, we have to manage a few things, the primary aspect, being the capacity to accommodate the information, as mentioned, and thereafter, the ability to lay out the information, in a way that permits the brain to communicate a conscious understanding.

How books are laid out, the separation of information, data, how terms are introduced, what foundations are taken for granted, and ways to convert the information within the book to knowledge, play a large part in learning by reading.
 
Last edited:
  • #14
Ephratah7 said:
Well, it depends who made the book, ... It's ok if you won't believe me. Since you're not from Philippines, I guess you haven't heard about a book which contains major mistakes and lots of parents and teachers are complaining.

Yes, since I'm also from the Philippines. The book you're talking about is "Asya". Lots of parents are complaining indeed.

But not all books have "mistakes".
 
  • #15
plug in both ends of the USB cable into your head and USB port in text and press download.
 
  • #16
Oerg said:
plug in both ends of the USB cable into your head and USB port in text and press download.

hehe.. hope it will work.
 
  • #17
Oerg said:
plug in both ends of the USB cable into your head and USB port in text and press download.

How domains are laid out, the separation of information, data, how terms are introduced, what foundations are taken for granted, and ways to convert the information within the domain to knowledge, play a large part in learning by downloading.
 
  • #18
Asya? a famous book in Philippines
 
  • #19
billiards said:
It is absolutely impossible for anyone to ever learn anything from a book. Anybody who tells you they have is lying.

vanesch said:
I find this an amazing statement :bugeye:

Perhaps I'm just paranoid, but to me it appeared to be saying, that my original question was stupid :biggrin:
 
  • #20
enricfemi said:
Asya? a famous book in Philippines

yes. high school students are using that book...
 
  • #21
billiards said:
It is absolutely impossible for anyone to ever learn anything from a book. Anybody who tells you they have is lying.

Wrong. I learn from books all the time. It requires discipline, but it can certainly be done.
 
  • #22
billiards said:
It is absolutely impossible for anyone to ever learn anything from a book. Anybody who tells you they have is lying.

Really now?:rolleyes:

vanesch said:
I find this an amazing statement :bugeye:

I'd have to agree there.:-p
 
  • #23
i'm pretty sure billiards was joking

i prefer books above any other means of learning
 
  • #24
I find books hard to learn from as well, but teachers can be just as hard for me. I found a mistake in our science book. It said a set of data added up to 101%.
 
  • #25
binzing said:
I find books hard to learn from as well, but teachers can be just as hard for me. I found a mistake in our science book. It said a set of data added up to 101%.

You should use a book that has numerous editions and has been around for awhile. It should be in use by most universities.

The chances for errors are really small as any errors would already have been corrected in previous publications in earlier editions.
 
  • #26
binzing said:
I find books hard to learn from as well, but teachers can be just as hard for me. I found a mistake in our science book. It said a set of data added up to 101%.
Did you ever think a few pointers from a stranger may help? No one teaches you, how to learn, most teachers take it for granted, that students can learn, and the only reason they give tests is students to show, they have learned. It's a really primitive way, but all that is available at this point in time.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 71 ·
3
Replies
71
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 45 ·
2
Replies
45
Views
8K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K