Is it possible to move without friction in space?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter karl22
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Friction Space
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the possibility of moving in space without friction or external propulsion methods, such as gas rockets. Participants explore the implications of Newton's laws of motion in a frictionless environment, particularly focusing on human movement and the limitations faced by astronauts in space.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants assert that movement in space requires a reaction force, which cannot be achieved by simply moving one's limbs without an external anchor or propulsion.
  • One participant questions how an astronaut could move if their propulsion system fails, suggesting that throwing tools or equipment could provide some means of movement.
  • Another participant proposes that theoretically, shining a flashlight could provide a form of propulsion due to the momentum of light, although they acknowledge the impracticality of this method.
  • Some participants discuss the dire consequences of being stranded in space without propulsion, including the potential for drifting away and the psychological aspects of dying from hypoxia.
  • There are mentions of the solar wind as a negligible force in the context of movement in space, with some participants emphasizing the hopelessness of attempting to 'swim' in space.
  • Concerns are raised about the practicalities of using cyanide capsules in emergencies, questioning how one could access them in a space environment.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that without an external force or propulsion, movement in space is not possible. However, there are competing views regarding the theoretical implications of light as a propulsion method and the psychological aspects of being stranded in space.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights limitations related to the assumptions of movement in a vacuum, the dependence on external forces for propulsion, and the unresolved nature of psychological responses to life-threatening situations in space.

karl22
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Hi
As you may know according to third law of Newton every action has a reaction.But my problem is that as we may know there is the need of friction for moving that you lean on something that you become able to move But as I have heard NASA has developed some gas-powered rocket maneuvering devices to allow astronauts to move freely in space without being tethered to the spacecraft (works according to third law of Newton)
But my question is without any friction and without any gas rocket and without anything that you stick to it,is it possible to move in space like by moving our bodies by ourselves ?
I mean is it possible to move without something that you stick to it or lean on it or without throwing anything from yourself ?
For example you just push your back with your hands then you move ?
Is it possible ?
Thank you very much for your answers
Have a nice day
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Perhaps you can clarify your question. To start moving you need a force. But once you're moving, you'll keep moving. (Newton's first law.)

In space a gas rocket exerts a force on you by pushing out the exhaust gas, in keeping with Newton's third law.
 
Simply, no. You can't 'swim' in space.

You can move your arms, legs or anything you want, but your net movement will always be zero. You need the reaction force or you won't go anywhere.

When you move your arm backwards, your body will move forward. Your centre of mass will remain stationary.
 
Thanks a lot foe the answers.
If this is the case then when the gas rocket of the astronaut becomes broken or it doesn't work anymore and the astronaut is left alone in the space without being able to stick to anything how could he move and change his location??
Is it even possible ?
 
He could start throwing his tools / equipment. It would be slow, but may just do it.

Without expelling something from your person (whether propellant or otherwise) you won't go anywhere.
 
OK thank you so much for the answer
But my my question is that if you throw your hands to one side so fast then pull you hands to your side again but slowly this time won't you move ?
 
karl22 said:
But my my question is that if you throw your hands to one side so fast then pull you hands to your side again but slowly this time won't you move ?
No. When you move your hands to one side, the rest of your body will move to the other side a bit to compensate. But your center of mass doesn't move (or rather it continues to move at the same velocity). It doesn't matter how fast or slow you move your hands.
 
Doc Al said:
No. When you move your hands to one side, the rest of your body will move to the other side a bit to compensate. But your center of mass doesn't move (or rather it continues to move at the same velocity). It doesn't matter how fast or slow you move your hands.

OK thank you so much for the answer
I got what I was looking for.
 
Yeah if you're in space and your gas rocket goes out, you're pretty much screwed. I don't think anyone has confirmed this, but they say that NASA gives astronauts cyanide capsules to bite down on just in case of such an event. Otherwise you can end up drifting sloooowly away until you die.

Perhaps I shouldn't mention this, but theoretically light has momentum, so you CAN accelerate simply by shining a flashlight.

It's important to understand though, that light has VERY little momentum. I'm not going to do the calculations, but I would wager that you would need thousands if not millions of years to get any noticeable velocity from a hand-held flashlight.
 
  • #10
Lsos said:
Yeah if you're in space and your gas rocket goes out, you're pretty much screwed. I don't think anyone has confirmed this, but they say that NASA gives astronauts cyanide capsules to bite down on just in case of such an event. Otherwise you can end up drifting sloooowly away until you die.

I'd prefer to just run out of oxygen, I hear it's not a terrible way to go - the old hypoxia - that would be slowly running out of oxygen so you don't notice it so badly. Just drift off in a "I don't care" kind of way.
Perhaps I shouldn't mention this, but theoretically light has momentum, so you CAN accelerate simply by shining a flashlight.

It's important to understand though, that light has VERY little momentum. I'm not going to do the calculations, but I would wager that you would need thousands if not millions of years to get any noticeable velocity from a hand-held flashlight.

If you've got enough oxygen to last the X months / years it takes to travel the relatively short distance to the ship - and that's assuming you're not moving away to begin with.
 
  • #11
The only fine point I'd add is the solar wind...it's a negligible "frictional force" in the above considerations ...made up of sparse densities of electrons and protons...
 
  • #12
Naty1 said:
The only fine point I'd add is the solar wind...it's a negligible "frictional force" in the above considerations ...made up of sparse densities of electrons and protons...

Well I think it's safe to say that if the situation posed by the OP occurs, there is absolutely nothing you can do to save yourself, especially so far as attempting to 'swim' in space goes.

If they don't come save you, you're in deep trouble.
 
  • #13
jarednjames said:
I'd prefer to just run out of oxygen, I hear it's not a terrible way to go - the old hypoxia - that would be slowly running out of oxygen so you don't notice it so badly. Just drift off in a "I don't care" kind of way.

This is true, I didn't think about that. It's supposed to be one of the most pleasant ways to die...to the point where once you start going down the slippery slope, even if you had a chance to save yourself you wouldn't necessarily do it.
 
  • #14
Lsos said:
This is true, I didn't think about that. It's supposed to be one of the most pleasant ways to die...to the point where once you start going down the slippery slope, even if you had a chance to save yourself you wouldn't necessarily do it.

That's what I like about it. You become 'happy' and just don't care.
 
  • #15
jarednjames said:
I'd prefer to just run out of oxygen, I hear it's not a terrible way to go - the old hypoxia - that would be slowly running out of oxygen so you don't notice it so badly. Just drift off in a "I don't care" kind of way.

I think it's only a nice way to go if you still can breathe something. But when spaceman Biff's tank approaches empty, he will struggle to breathe and won't be able to get a breath, very unpleasent, like your SCUBA tank going empty. As for the cyanide, how can Biff move it into his mouth?
 
  • #16
Oldfart said:
I think it's only a nice way to go if you still can breathe something. But when spaceman Biff's tank approaches empty, he will struggle to breathe and won't be able to get a breath, very unpleasent, like your SCUBA tank going empty. As for the cyanide, how can Biff move it into his mouth?

In scuba, when you breathe out the exhaust is ejected so when the tanks are empty you can't draw anything in - horrible suffocation.

I figured the CO2 would build up in the helmet as the O2 started to get too low. The only way this wouldn't hold is if they have a dedicated pump removing CO2 from the helmet.
 
  • #17
Oldfart said:
As for the cyanide, how can Biff move it into his mouth?

I guess the idea is to keep the capsule in your mouth so that you can bite down on it when needed. I don't know, sounds dangerous. It doesn't really matter, it's probably an old wives' tale anyway.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
4K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
5K
  • · Replies 72 ·
3
Replies
72
Views
9K
  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
5K