Is it possible to tell whether ship is moving or not?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Meson080
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ship
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the principle of relativity and whether it's possible to determine if a ship, or bus, is moving. It argues that motion is relative, meaning an observer inside a moving bus cannot tell if the bus is in motion without an external reference. Various thought experiments involving insects and robotic flies illustrate that while mechanical interactions can suggest relative motion, they do not provide an absolute measure of movement. Ultimately, the conversation highlights the challenge of defining motion without a reference point, emphasizing that all motion is relative to something else. The conclusion is that without an external reference, one cannot definitively ascertain absolute motion.
  • #51
Meson080 said:
How does the speedometer in your bike say your bike's speed?

It counts the revolution of the wheel relative to the bike and measures the corresponding time. Together with the radius of the wheel this gives the tangential speed of the tire relative to the bike. As long as the bike is rolling on the ground without slip, the result is equal to the speed of the ground relative to the bike and to the speed of the bike relative to the ground respectively. In short: the speedometer measures the speed of the bike relative to the ground.

How does your remote control measures the speed of the fly - especially relative to which reference?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #52
A.T. said:
How does your speedometer work?

That's a technical thing. I am not discussing about it.
 
  • #53
Meson080 said:
That's a technical thing. I am not discussing about it.
If you cannot describe your proposed experiment, then there is nothing to discuss at all.
 
  • #54
TheDemx27 said:
Unless you are accelerating, you cannot tell whether the bus is at rest or not. At a uniform velocity, all of the forces are in equilibrium as they are when at rest. If they fly does fly into the car (perfectly) it will remain stationary with respect to the car as it is suspended within the air inside the car.

I often thought about this situation as well, anecdotally.

Remember I am considering vaccum.
 
  • #55
A.T. said:
If you cannot describe your proposed experiment, then there is nothing to discuss at all.

Do you think it is impossible to create such a device? Why do you think? I think it is possible.
 
  • #56
Meson080 said:
I think it is possible.
How?
 
  • #57
DrStupid said:
It counts the revolution of the wheel relative to the bike and measures the corresponding time. Together with the radius of the wheel this gives the tangential speed of the tire relative to the bike. As long as the bike is rolling on the ground without slip, the result is equal to the speed of the ground relative to the bike and to the speed of the bike relative to the ground respectively. In short: the speedometer measures the speed of the bike relative to the ground.

How does your remote control measures the speed of the fly - especially relative to which reference?

Thank you for the explanation. I just wanted to say that, as your speedometer works, even my speedometer works. Its a technical aspect. We are dealing with different thread. If you can say anything that such a device is not possible to construct, I can try to explain it and it will be valuable to stay on topic in this thread.
 
  • #58
Meson080 said:
I just wanted to say that, as your speedometer works, even my speedometer works.
If your speedometer works, why don't you attach it to the bus directly, to know if the bus is moving? Why do you need a robotic fly with a remote control?


Meson080 said:
Its a technical aspect.
It is the key part of your experiment, that you have to define precisely. If you cannot define your proposed experiment, then there is nothing to discuss at all.
 
  • #59
A.T. said:
How?

I am sure it is possible. Similar to the speedometer in the bike as DrStupid explained, the meter in the fly's body can note down the reading, and then it can send info to the remote either through radiation or anything. It is just my idea that it is possible. Don't consider it seriously. If you want to consider it seriously, please explain why you think it is impossible to develop such a device. So that it makes us to stay on topic by speaking about technical aspects. Thank you.
 
  • #60
Meson080 said:
Remember I am considering vaccum.

Still, it would simply be suspended in space with respect to the vehicle.

Being inside a vehicle doesn't change anything. The fly and the car are moving with a constant velocity v. The fly, outside the vehicle, moves into the car. The fly is still moving at the constant velocity v, and it is experiencing no net forces whatsoever. It doesn't move with respect to the vehicle.
 
  • #61
Meson080 said:
It is just my idea that it is possible.
So you have actually no idea how to determine whether something is moving or not. You just have the idea that it is possible.
 
  • #62
@A.T: Yes I just have the idea that it is possible. What's the problem?
 
  • #63
Meson080 said:
Yes I just have the idea that it is possible.
Great. When you have figured out how, let us know.
 
  • #64
A.T. said:
Great. When you have figured out how, let us know.

Sorry, I have already said that unless you say anything why it is important to speak about technical part and mainly why you think it is "impossible" to create such a device, I can't say anything (to stay on topic and be according to forum rules). Thank you for your support until now. Good night.:zzz:
 
Last edited:
  • #65
Meson080 said:
Sorry, I have already said that unless you say anything why it is important to speak about technical part and mainly why you think it is "impossible" to create such a device, I can't say anything (to stay on topic and be according to forum rules). Thank you for your support until now.

It is important because all speedometers operate by measuring the speed of something relative to something else.

For example:
- The speedometer in a car counts revolutions of the wheels in a given time, multiplies by the know circumference of the wheel, and uses that to calculate the speed of the car relative to the road; the speedometer will produce an incorrect speed value if you lock the wheels so that the rotation of the wheel is no longer related to the speed of the car.
- A GPS measures the movement of the receiver relative to satellites orbiting the earth; because we know where the satellites are relative to the Earth it can calculate the its speed relative to the earth.
- Radar systems measure the speed of aircraft relative to the source of the radar transmitter and receiver.
- When we speak of the speed of the Earth in its orbit around the sun (several kilometers a second) we are measuring its speed relative to the sun.
 
  • #66
The problem is that velocity is always measured with respect to something else. There are a few ways to build speedometers that work in vacuums, such as an accelerometer with an integrator, radar, GPS, or such like.

However, each of these is with respect to a reference velocity. If you use the radar method, then the reference is the velocity of the transmitter, which is an unknown factor. If you use an accelerometer, then the reference velocity is the initial velocity, which is unknown. GPS can be faulty if, for example, the satellites are struck by meteors and put in an unknown orbit.
 
  • #67
Enough.

Meson080, it is impossible because the laws of mechanics are second-order differential equations. In other words, they contain acceleration, not velocity.

Thread closed.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Replies
20
Views
1K
2
Replies
52
Views
7K
Replies
21
Views
3K
2
Replies
96
Views
9K
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • Poll Poll
Replies
12
Views
2K
Back
Top