Is it possible to tell whether ship is moving or not?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Meson080
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ship
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the principle of relativity and whether it is possible to determine if a ship, or bus, is moving. Participants argue that motion is relative, and experiments involving an insect or robotic fly inside a moving vehicle can indicate relative motion but not absolute motion. The consensus is that without an external reference point, one cannot definitively ascertain the movement of the bus or the fly. The conversation highlights the complexities of measuring motion and the importance of reference frames in understanding relativity.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Newton's laws of motion
  • Familiarity with the principle of relativity
  • Basic knowledge of reference frames in physics
  • Concept of uniform motion versus acceleration
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of Newton's laws on modern physics
  • Explore Einstein's theory of relativity and its applications
  • Study the concept of inertial frames of reference
  • Investigate experiments that demonstrate relative motion, such as the Michelson-Morley experiment
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, educators, and anyone interested in the fundamental concepts of motion and relativity will benefit from this discussion.

  • #61
Meson080 said:
It is just my idea that it is possible.
So you have actually no idea how to determine whether something is moving or not. You just have the idea that it is possible.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #62
@A.T: Yes I just have the idea that it is possible. What's the problem?
 
  • #63
Meson080 said:
Yes I just have the idea that it is possible.
Great. When you have figured out how, let us know.
 
  • #64
A.T. said:
Great. When you have figured out how, let us know.

Sorry, I have already said that unless you say anything why it is important to speak about technical part and mainly why you think it is "impossible" to create such a device, I can't say anything (to stay on topic and be according to forum rules). Thank you for your support until now. Good night.:zzz:
 
Last edited:
  • #65
Meson080 said:
Sorry, I have already said that unless you say anything why it is important to speak about technical part and mainly why you think it is "impossible" to create such a device, I can't say anything (to stay on topic and be according to forum rules). Thank you for your support until now.

It is important because all speedometers operate by measuring the speed of something relative to something else.

For example:
- The speedometer in a car counts revolutions of the wheels in a given time, multiplies by the know circumference of the wheel, and uses that to calculate the speed of the car relative to the road; the speedometer will produce an incorrect speed value if you lock the wheels so that the rotation of the wheel is no longer related to the speed of the car.
- A GPS measures the movement of the receiver relative to satellites orbiting the earth; because we know where the satellites are relative to the Earth it can calculate the its speed relative to the earth.
- Radar systems measure the speed of aircraft relative to the source of the radar transmitter and receiver.
- When we speak of the speed of the Earth in its orbit around the sun (several kilometers a second) we are measuring its speed relative to the sun.
 
  • #66
The problem is that velocity is always measured with respect to something else. There are a few ways to build speedometers that work in vacuums, such as an accelerometer with an integrator, radar, GPS, or such like.

However, each of these is with respect to a reference velocity. If you use the radar method, then the reference is the velocity of the transmitter, which is an unknown factor. If you use an accelerometer, then the reference velocity is the initial velocity, which is unknown. GPS can be faulty if, for example, the satellites are struck by meteors and put in an unknown orbit.
 
  • #67
Enough.

Meson080, it is impossible because the laws of mechanics are second-order differential equations. In other words, they contain acceleration, not velocity.

Thread closed.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 50 ·
2
Replies
50
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
6K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
5K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
2K
  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
4K