Is it worth going through all of Landau-Lifshitz?

  • Thread starter Thread starter capandbells
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the value of the Landau-Lifshitz series in theoretical physics. Participants recommend essential texts such as "Mechanics" and "Classical Theory of Fields" for foundational knowledge, while cautioning against the newer printings due to poor quality. "Quantum Mechanics" remains a solid reference despite its outdated notation, and "Quantum Electrodynamics" serves as a detailed resource rather than an introductory text. The "Shorter Course of Theoretical Physics" and "Statistical Physics 1 and 2" are highlighted as valuable resources, with the latter being crucial for understanding advanced topics in kinetic theory.

PREREQUISITES
  • Familiarity with classical mechanics principles
  • Understanding of electromagnetic theory
  • Basic knowledge of quantum mechanics
  • Awareness of modern quantum field theory concepts
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the "Shorter Course of Theoretical Physics" for a condensed overview of the series
  • Explore "Statistical Physics 1 and 2" for insights into kinetic theory and plasmas
  • Investigate modern quantum field theory techniques, particularly path integrals
  • Review advanced general relativity texts for comprehensive coverage beyond "Classical Theory of Fields"
USEFUL FOR

The discussion is beneficial for physics students, educators, and researchers seeking to deepen their understanding of theoretical physics through the Landau-Lifshitz series and its applications.

capandbells
Messages
95
Reaction score
0
Do you guys think it would be beneficial to take on the entire series of Landau and Lifgarbagez books, or do you think it would be better to cherry-pick books for each of the topics in the series? Which of the LL books do you think are the strongest (I mean: best selection of topics, clearest presentation, most relevant to modern theoretical physics)? The weakest? Are there any 'must reads' among them?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
capandbells said:
Do you guys think it would be beneficial to take on the entire series of Landau and Lifgarbagez books, or do you think it would be better to cherry-pick books for each of the topics in the series? Which of the LL books do you think are the strongest (I mean: best selection of topics, clearest presentation, most relevant to modern theoretical physics)? The weakest? Are there any 'must reads' among them?

If you plan on buying any of the books you should know that the new owner of this imprint has done a shamefully bad job with newer printings, with much of the small print typsetting smudged and unreadable. I would be very careful with purchasing site unseen.

I have

Mechanics
Classical Theory of Fields
Quantum Mechanics
Quantum Electrodynamics

I think Mechanics is essential. CToF is very good for the electrodynamics topics it covers, but I would not suggest it for an intro to GR, and there are better advanced GR books that cover more topics. The QED book is, I think, most useful to those who need a more detailed reference on QED specifically. I wouldn't suggest it as an intro to modern QFT. The QM book is a little old-fashioned in its notation, but I don't think that should really cause any problems for modern readers, and it's still a good general QM reference.

There was also the Shorter Course of Theoretical Physics, which was a condensation of the series.
 
Last edited:
Statistical Physics 1 and 2 are awesome, so is Physical Kinetics. Yet to understand the last one, its the culmination of the last 5 books. So that's Stat 1, Fluids, Elasticity, Continuous Electro, and Stat 2. It is a beautiful treatment of plasmas using kinetic theory and a Feynman-like graph method that was developed in Stat 2. Mechanics seemed too brief for me, Classical Fields was nice using the invariant approach for E/M to derive relativity. The quantum book is good but the QED is possibly outdated but a great historical reference on deriving the Dirac equation with spinors and the theory of radiation. It seems Path integrals are the popular way in QED and QFD right now.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
9K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K