Is Light's Terminal Velocity 300,000 km/s?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the concept of light's speed being a terminal velocity of 300,000 km/s, suggesting that gravitational forces and Cosmic Background Radiation (CBR) might influence this speed. However, participants assert that light's speed is invariant, as established by Maxwell's theory of electromagnetism and Einstein's special theory of relativity. The consensus is that light does not accelerate and must always travel at the speed of light (c) regardless of external influences. The conversation emphasizes the fundamental principles of physics that govern light's behavior.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Maxwell's theory of electromagnetism
  • Familiarity with Einstein's special theory of relativity
  • Basic knowledge of Cosmic Background Radiation (CBR)
  • Concept of light as a quantum phenomenon
NEXT STEPS
  • Research Maxwell's equations and their implications for light propagation
  • Study Einstein's special theory of relativity and its impact on the speed of light
  • Explore the properties and significance of Cosmic Background Radiation (CBR)
  • Investigate the quantum mechanics of light and its behavior in different gravitational fields
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, students of physics, and anyone interested in the fundamental properties of light and the theories that explain its behavior in the universe.

questionauthority
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I have a theory about light: could our observations of light always traveling at 300 000 km/s be explained as the terminal velocity of light? When an object falls through the atmosphere it will eventually stop accelerating because the pressure of the atmosphere equals the pull of gravity. What if light is being pulled to the speed of 300 000 km/s by the gravity of the Earth and a substance, perhaps the Cosmic Background Radiation, keeps it from accelerating past that?

Thoughts?

questionauthority
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
I'm not sure what you're asking. Is it "can light be accelerated?" Well, technically no. But it does gain momentum when falling into a gravity well, like the Earth's gravitational field. You see light always moves at the same speed to all observers.
 
Isn't the CBR... a form of light?
 
questionauthority said:
could our observations of light always traveling at 300 000 km/s be explained as the terminal velocity of light?
No. As others have pointed out, concepts of acceleration and light do not mix. Our observation that light always travels at a set rate has been explained by the special theory of relativity.

It is also important to note that the experiments showing light travels at a set rate were preceeded by Maxwell's theory of electromagnetism. According to Maxwell's theory of electromagnetism and the principle of relativity, light must always travel at c. I think it was Brian Greene who said, "No one has ever held a lump of light in their hands," clarifying the notion that light *must* travel at c to exist (this is explained by both Maxwell's theory and quantum mechanics and goes hand-in-hand with Einstein's special theory of relativity).
 
Last edited:
If you were right, then light would travel at different speeds perpendicular to the Earth's surface than parallel to it. And it doesn't.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
23K
  • · Replies 51 ·
2
Replies
51
Views
5K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
997
  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
8K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K