Is M a Vector Space Over Real Numbers?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around determining whether a specific set of vectors, defined by certain limitations on their components, constitutes a vector space over the field of real numbers. The limitations include conditions on the first component being rational, equal to zero, and specific linear relationships between the components.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the concept of closure under addition and scalar multiplication for the set M, questioning whether the results of these operations remain within the set given the stated limitations. Some participants express confusion about the implications of the limitations on the vector space properties.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided insights into checking closure under operations, while others have begun to analyze specific cases to illustrate their points. There is a recognition of the need to verify additional vector space axioms beyond closure, indicating a productive exploration of the topic.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the original problem has multiple limitations that affect the analysis of the vector space properties, and there is an acknowledgment of the complexity introduced by these conditions.

iloveannaw
Messages
38
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



show whether the following set of vectors [tex]M = \left\{\left(a_{1},a_{2},a_{3}\right) with a_{1},a_{2},a_{3} \in \Re\right\}[/tex]

with the following limitations:
1) a1 is rational
2) a1 = 0
3) a1 + a2 = 0
4) a1 + a2 = 1

is a vector space over the field of real numbers.

Homework Equations


various axioms
* x+y = y+x.
* (x+y)+z = x+(y+z).
* 0+x = x+0 = x.
* (-x) + x = x + (-x) = 0.

For every x in X and real numbers c,d, we have

* 0x = 0
* 1x = x
* (cd)x = c(dx)

* c(x+y) = cx + cy.
* (c+d)x = cx +dx.

The Attempt at a Solution



I just don't get it, I really wish I could. I understand the axioms but when I apply them i find that M is a vector space regardless of the limitations.

somebody please help
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You'll need to check a few things, first of all you'll need closure of the operations.
What do I mean with that?

Take [tex](a_1,a_2,a_3)[/tex] and [tex](b_1,b_2,b_3)[/tex] in M. Does [tex](a_1+b_1,a_2+b_2,a_3+b_3)[/tex] lie in M. In other words, does this triple satisfy the three limitations. This means that the addition is closed in M.

Take [tex](a_1,a_2,a_3)[/tex] in M and [tex]\alpha\in \mathbb{R}[/tex]. Does [tex](\alpha a_1,\alpha a_2, \alpha a_3)[/tex] lie in M. In other words, does this triple satisfy the three limitations. This means that scalar products are closed in M.

I conjecture that neither addition nor multiplication is closed in M (thus we are not dealing with a vector space). Can you give me examples why not?
 
how could you tell if
[tex](a_1+b_1,a_2+b_2,a_3+b_3)[/tex] was in M or not, in fact what is in M? I know at least vector [tex](a_1,a_2,a_3)[/tex]

and there are four limitations now - i just edited my op

thanks
 
I actually realized that you had 4 problems.

Let me solve problem 1 fo you:
So let M be the collection of triples [tex](a_1,a_2,a_3)[/tex] such that [tex]a_1[/tex] is rational.

First we check closure under addition. Take two triples [tex](a_1,a_2,a_3)[/tex] and [tex](b_1,b_2,b_3)[/tex] in M. This means that [tex]a_1[/tex] and [tex]a_2[/tex] are rational. We need to check that [tex](a_1,a_2,a_3)+(b_1,b_2,b_3)=(a_1+b_1,a_2+b_2,a_3+b_3)[/tex] is in M. For this, we just need to check that [tex]a_1+b_1[/tex] is rational. But since [tex]a_1[/tex] and [tex]a_2[/tex] are rational, so is their sum.
So closure under addition is checked.

Now, closure under multplication. Take a triple [tex](a_1,a_2,a_3)[/tex] in M (this means that [tex]a_1[/tex] is rational) and [tex]\alpha\in \mathbb{R}[/tex]. We need to check that [tex](\alpha a_1,\alpha a_2,\alpha a_3)[/tex] is in M. For this, we just need to check that [tex]\alpha a_1[/tex] is rational. But this is not always the case. For example, [tex](a_1,a_2,a_3)[/tex] could be [tex](1,0,0)[/tex] (this is indeed a vector in M) and [tex]\alpha[/tex] could be [tex]\pi[/tex], then [tex](\alpha a_1,\alpha a_2,\alpha a_3)=(\pi, 0,0)[/tex]. This is not in M, since [tex]\pi[/tex] is not rational.
So we do not have closure under multiplication, so we do not have a vector space.

Can you check the other examples? this is quite analogous.
 
thanks, that seems so much clearer. I knew that the result of the operation had to remain in M but I had no idea what that meant.
hmm, if I've understood it 2) a1 = 0 and 3) a1 + a2 = 0 are vector spaces over R and
4) a1 + a2 = 1 isn't because

[tex]a_{1} = 1 - a_{2}[/tex] and [tex]b_{1} = 1 - b_{2}[/tex]

[tex](a_{1} + b_{1}, a_{2} + b_{2}, a_{3} + b_{3}) = (1 - a_{2} + 1 - b_{2}, a_{2} + b_{2}, a_{3} + b_{3})[/tex]

and

[tex]1 - a_{2} + 1 - b_{2} + a_{2} + b_{2} = 2[/tex] != 1
 
Yes! I've think you've got it.

But note, for 2 and 3, you've just checked that the space is closed under the operations. You'll need to check the other axioms of a vector space to (associativity, neutral element,...). But this shouldn't be to much of a problem...

For 1 and 4, you've seen that they are not closed under the operations, so they cannot be vector spaces...
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
5K