Is Momentum the Reason Behind Inertia?

  • Thread starter Thread starter rita_sharma
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Inertia Momentum
AI Thread Summary
Momentum and inertia are interconnected concepts in physics, with momentum defined as mass times velocity and inertia as the resistance of an object to change its state of motion. While momentum can be viewed as a measure of inertia, it is not accurate to say that one is the reason for the other; rather, they serve different purposes in understanding motion. Inertia indicates that a force is needed to alter an object's motion, while momentum encompasses a broader range of properties related to movement. The discussion emphasizes that both concepts are essential, with inertia being a specific aspect of the more comprehensive concept of momentum. Understanding their relationship enhances clarity in discussions about motion and forces.
rita_sharma
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Can we say that momentum is the reason behind inertia? like momentum explains inertia.

Momentum:- mass * velocity

net force is the rate of change of momentum.

f=mv/t

and

Inertia:- it is the tendency of an object to stay in the state of motion it currently is in i.e resist the change of state of motion.

For example:- a car speeds up (accelerates) but later at some point the velocity becomes constant(assume there is no other force acting on the object).now the net force on the object is zero(so is acceleration) but the object continues to move with constant velocity and hence it has the same momentum (since mass isn't changing and neither is velocity). so no force but momentum is still there.

momentum is the energy which the moving object has right?
when there is some velocity the momentum remains constant and the object keeps moving because of this and when the velocity is zero then momentum is zero and thus the object remains at rest.

here not changing its velocity is the the objects 'tendency' we call it inertia and momentum is what keeps the object moving.

so what i think is:
inertia tells us that the state of motion will not change and
momentum tells us the reason behind it(it is the reason) sort of like "it happens" and "why it happens"


am i right right? or i am confusing them both?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yeah inertia is resistance to motion; momentum can be thought of as a measure of inertia.
 
momentum is a measure of energy-movement

inertia just says that can't change unless an outside energy hits it
 
michaelc187 said:
momentum is a measure of energy-movement

inertia just says that can't change unless an outside energy hits it

So are momentum and inertia connected or not?
 
Dr_Scientist said:
Yeah inertia is resistance to motion; momentum can be thought of as a measure of inertia.

But isn't mass the measure of inertia?
 
rita_sharma said:
But isn't mass the measure of inertia?

Mass is a measure of inertia, and so is momentum.
See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inertia

For me, I think inertia is a concept invented just to explain the concept of mass and momentum.
 
rita_sharma said:
Can we say that momentum is the reason behind inertia? like momentum explains inertia.

net force is the rate of change of momentum.

f=mv/t

I think it's not helpful to think in terms of one being the reason for the other.The concept of inertia is subsumed in the concept of momentum.
What I mean is, the concept of momentum as we define it covers a lot of ground, a wide range of properties is included in the definition. The concept of inertia is more focused. The concept of inertia just says that one thing: that a force is required to change the state of motion of an object.
If you accept momentum as something meaningful, you're automatically also accepting the concept of inertia. The comprehensive concept of momentum implies the more specific concept of inertia.

Conversely, the concept of inertia does not specify all of the more general concept of momentum.
This doesn't mean the word 'inertia' is superfluous. It's practical to have a specific word for an aspect of a larger whole.

So don't think of one as "the reason" for the other, or one explaining the other. It isn't like that. This is about language. We have concepts, and words to refer to those concepts.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top