Is MOND Related to Renormalization? A Review on the Connection

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter maverick_starstrider
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    mond Renormalization
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the potential relationship between Modified Newtonian Dynamics (MOND) and the concept of renormalization, particularly in the context of field theory. Participants explore whether there are connections between these two areas and seek resources that could clarify this relationship, especially for those with a background in condensed matter physics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests that MOND may exhibit characteristics similar to field renormalization, where the gravitational constant G could be considered a running constant.
  • Another participant points to a Wikipedia article on MOND but expresses dissatisfaction, noting that it does not address the question of renormalization and contains potentially misleading statements.
  • There is a sentiment that the original question may be too vague or professional for many participants to engage with effectively.
  • One participant expresses frustration at the reliance on Wikipedia for complex discussions and emphasizes the need for someone knowledgeable in quantum field theory (QFT) to contribute meaningfully.
  • A suggestion is made that the question might receive more attention if posted in a different subforum focused on topics beyond the standard model.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the relationship between MOND and renormalization, and there are multiple competing views regarding the adequacy of existing resources and the clarity of the original question.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty about the clarity and specificity of the original question, indicating that it may depend on the definitions and interpretations of MOND and renormalization. There is also a suggestion that the discussion may benefit from input from specialists in the field.

maverick_starstrider
Messages
1,118
Reaction score
7
Hey,

I'm just curious, MOND (Modified Newtonian Dynamics) seems to have a character of field renormalization where G is a running constant. Is there something to this relationship? Does anyone know of a review article that discusses this (or at least an article that someone in condensed matter could understand)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
beamrider said:
This is the Wikipedia article about MOND:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Modified_Newtonian_dynamics
It did not answer your question?

I don't see anything about renormalization in there. Plus the article seems kinda unprofessional. There are some statements in there that are either fishy or misleading. Regardless I don't see where I'm supposed to be looking.
 
OK, in this case you have to wait for a specialist in MOND that, by chance, will find your question. It will take some time.
Your question is either vague or too professional, so most of the people do not understand what you really want.
 
Last edited:
beamrider said:
OK, in this case you have to wait for a specialist in MOND that, by chance, will find your question. It will take some time.
Your question is either vague or too professional, so most of the people do not understand what you really want.

Um.. ok.. so you come to a thread about MOND and QFT and don't know MOND or QFT and decide to simply plop down wikipedia and hope for the best? Can't quite say I see the point. Anyway, I appreciate the time taken but someone who knows QFT will know what I'm talking about.
 
I bet the most satisfactory answer you will ever get on this forum will be that page from Wikipedia, I mentioned.
You will be less satisfied with other answers.
 
I wonder if this question would get more attention in the 'beyond the standard model' subforum ?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
614
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 72 ·
3
Replies
72
Views
11K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K